@pa10ma and @moussemoose
Not that it matters, but I don’t support any of the xenophobic views or thoughts on immigration that you see on these Brexit threads. Not by a long shot! Please don’t confuse my explanations with actual support!
What you say is true: the UK is indeed on a path to extremism, the country does harbour huge numbers of racists, people did vote on lines that largely weren’t based on fact. THIS is the problem. The referendum gave these people a platform to express themselves.
The EU is led by intellectual elites who have largely left the populace behind in a country where national leadership does nothing to bridge the gap between the electorate and the EU. Yes the machinery of democratic governance is there. But it’s not used properly. So people are largely ignorant of the EU, what it does, what it’s for, how it serves them. They feel the EU just dictates and takes money. This fundamental breakdown of visible accountability and a national leadership which has always been so-so about the EU is what was behind the result, I think.
This is a huge problem. It’s a cultural thing, not something that can change in a few months. Think about it: voters knew much much more about the EU / what it does / who the players are / what it is for under Thatcher and Major, and maybe even Blair than they do now. The rest of the EU is far more aware and “in” with the EU than the UK. Always has been. The regular person on the street in France or Germany or Spain would know much more about subsidies and quotas and tariffs and immigration than their fellow EU national in the UK. The UK has never been fully in board.
Parliament is sovereign, that’s immutable. But consider the trust lost in Parliament (because let’s face it, where were Labour or the Lib Dems when the referendum was called?) if a second referendum happens. Especially if the same result ensues (see above and polls since, suggesting this is possible if not probable).