Kikipost
I know people who have pets and the animals have idyllic lives but have known far too many over the years who have bought pets - especially dogs or smaller animals because they "wanted one" but haven't given any thought to the animals' needs at all.
This includes 3 large poodles that were never walked - never. They were allowed into the smallish garden for toileting and when the owner got fed up of them barking in the house and were taken to get their coats clipped every few months. Never left the house otherwise. But the owner loved dogs and always wanted dogs around them and the dogs kept them company in the daytime...
A Jack Russell that was rarely walked because it was described as a 'lapdog'. Wasn't taken out if it was cold, raining or the owner was tired/having a bad day/had something better to do...
There are more examples.
Or people who have smaller animals - hamsters up to rabbits who think that because they are smaller/less 'vocal'/more easily ignored than dogs, they are easier to own and don't mind being cooped up and ignored.
These animals, and most pets to be fair, aren't living in natural environments or environments that mimic natural environments.
Take rabbits for example - 'a hutch is not enough' is the current thing. The minimum recommended housing space for rabbits is a 6ftx2ftx2ft hutch with a minimum of 4 hours a day in a 6ftx4ft run. The natural roaming patch of a wild rabbit is something like the area of 2 football pitches. There are an awful lot of rabbit owners who don't meet even the minimum recommended requirements. But they love rabbits.
There are a lot of people who buy an animal thinking about how it will make their lives better without fully considering whether they can meet the basic needs of their pets.