As people have repeatedly said, individual breakfast habits are not the issue here. It’s the OP’s attitude that aggravated me.
Even the way she describes herself as being “hauled into school” speaks volumes. She wasn’t hauled anywhere. She was called in to collect her DD who was ill.
If you are a school nurse and a 13 year- old comes in, complaining of dizziness, there a certain questions it might occur to you to ask, aren’t there. Fairly high on the list might be, “What have you eaten today?”
The DD herself told the school she hadn’t had breakfast for 5 weeks. The school simply mentioned this to the mother.
The normal response to this would be something along the lines of - “Thankyou for your concern. DD is not a fan of breakfast, but I will discuss this with her and try and find out what she is actually eating and when and if this is having an impact on her energy levels and learning. Thankyou so much for you time and please do let me know if there are any further concerns.”
In the normal sphere, that would be it.
But no, the OP comes on here to drum up support in mocking people who are only trying to do their job. Seriously, what did she expect the nurse to do?
Now on MN, the very basic advice that children of school age should eat some form of breakfast if possible is being hailed as propaganda!
What will it be next - “dinner propaganda?” “Vegetable propaganda” if your DC don’t like veg?



I think my DC probably don’t drink enough water. If they were dizzy or ill and someone suggested it may be because they were dehydrated, should I kick off and accuse them off pedalling pro water “propaganda” and get super defensive and rude? Or would I just say, “Sure, I get them a drink?”
So many excuses and so much whataboutery for what is essentially obtuse, defensive behaviour as set out in the OP.