The vast majority of tweets are completely against this.
This, from Rachel McKinnon: "I’m sometimes misquoted as saying the performance advantage is irrelevant. It’s not, per se, that the advantage question is irrelevant. Its that the way that we think about human rights, in that legal and ethical standards of when it’s OK to override a person’s human right, is that the performance advantages aren’t high enough."
So what they're saying is that their rights trump women's rights?
Absolutely ridiculous.
What these people can't seem to grasp is that we don't just have a women's category so that we can paint our nails and braid each other's hair in the changing room before competitions. It has nothing to do with 'feelings' or presenting as feminine or whatever. We have women's sports because we have a MASSIVE physical disadvantage compared to men.
Rachel McKinnon seems to keep going on about how she doesn't win every race as if that is proof. I mean, maybe one time out of 20 I could beat my husband in some kind of race, but that doesn't mean I'm therefore on a level playing field. We have no idea how long each competitor has been training, physical issues they have, diet, how good their coach is etc. They seem to think that unless they are mashing the competition every time, they're not really a thread.
Serena Williams is far stronger than most women, more skilled and the best woman tennis player ever. But even she can't beat a pretty mediocre male tennis player. How can they not see that that means that people born as men simply cannot compete against women in any way that is fair?
I sincerely hope that people speak out against this. This is not fair AT ALL.