Doesn’t this just highlight that the fundamental issue here is the sex v gender issue and that no one (in power) seems to be able to figure out how to balance this, nor how to protect the rights of everybody without trying to define, redefine and railroad ‘the other.’ It’s all fence building then rather than boundary busting.
If a trans women identifies as a woman then ‘adult human female’ surely also, in its way, applies, if we’re talking about their true biological self.
If the issue is the use of the word ‘female’ then the issue lay not with women protecting their right to be female but with those who believe we should not assign names to our biological sex because it is construed as discrimination. That is a social and medical impossibility. We can not erase the existence of biological sex!
I can sort of see why Ocado took the board down as it was obviously supposed to be goady but, quite simply, could similar not also have been used by a pro group to make the same point? Otherwise what is actually happening is an admission that these words can’t belong to a trans woman if the use of ‘female’ can be seen as hate speech. What would have happened if the billboard was supposed to have that message and women had been in uproar? Would they all have been called transphobic when it’s not actually about that at all - it’s about a woman’s right to also be allowed to self id.
I totally support a trans woman’s right to call herself a woman but I will also, always, defend my right to call myself, factually and accurately, a female. That is my right, my self-id, and as a human/female/whatever else i consider myself, my choice of descriptors is not designed to undermine anyone else’s.
The other side of this issue is a huge discussion that needs to put measures in place to protect everyone in any situation and one I think cannot be swiftly dealt with. A simple idea I’ve recently seen at a gender neutral toilet was that there was not a door into the area, rather a very wide archway, so it is an open space other than the cubicles. They could do the same with changing rooms so that there is less of a feeling of being ‘locked away’ but these would have to be mandatory, legal steps to make this a feasible way to honour and protect all individuals.