I think you need to learn how to read stats - only 15% of rapes are reported. Of those, 48% result in a charge. This doesn't mean going to court. The 58% convictions are the very few that DO go to court. It's a tiny proportion of rapes that take place, if a man rapes someone he's highly likely to get away with it
To reinforce that point - start with 1000 women who've been raped.
15% of them 150 report.
Of those 150, 48% to to trial. That's 72 cases.
Of those 72 cases, 58% result in convictions. That's just a shade under 42.
Of our 1000 women, that means that 958 of them don't see their attacker convicted. Of the men carrying out those rapes, that means most walk free to carry out more rapes.
Compare the 72 cases out of 1000 reaching trial for rape with the figures for murder and manslaughter.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/getting-away-murder-more-quarter-12334711
In the area covered by the Metropolitan police, 72% of murder cases reached trial - that's 10 times as many as for rape. And that was considered a scandal because that year the figure had fallen from its previous value of 90%.
(I'm not sure what I'm more gobsmacked by on this thread - the rape apologism or the fact that the rape apologists can't fucking do maths.)