sweet
Ok, so putting myself in the school perspective (as much as I can, this place seems odd).
Reasonable to brief teachers, nothing to justify being funny with you. A simple round robin would have sufficed.
Saying you want a tick list would have really rubbed me up the wrong way if I'm honest (and that's someone who has backed parents 'against' colleagues on some issues).
There seems to be a few issues coming through again, meds vs telling off vs consistency.
Meds, I wouldn't say everyone needs to know everything. If there's a revolving door of staff for a subject then they don't (unless I've missed something) all need detailed briefing. What should happen is a simple 'if X is unwell, get a peer to escort him to Mrs Blogs or Mr Smith'. Nominated staff normally deal with that sort of thing.
Consistency - different sport and different staff seems to be a standard part of games. I'm not sure lack of consistency there would be a reasonable complaint.
Behaviour / incident being yelled at and not knowing why - as ever, I always advise caution, yelling or firm voice? No reason or no reason that i like? (Only say because just today I'd kept a student back for 'no reason'. There was a reason. They didn'r agree the reason warranted being kept back).
Keep the main thing the main thing and focus on that. Like PP, I'd go down the route of seeking a simple plan to follow for DC with a nominated person/people for medical issues.