The problem with Brexit is that the leave campaign and some of their voters have used a marginal victory in an advisory referendum in order to force through an agenda that wasn't on the ballot.
As we can see from this thread, many of the arguments for leave are confused too. Previous posters have talked about the EU being controlled by Germany, David Cameron not being offered a good deal etc, which is just all incorrect.
The EU is not "controlled" by Germany and the UK does not have its interests denied, the UK has been on the losing side of votes on only 2% of occasions since 1999.
Cameron was offered almost everything he went to the EU for, and the UK already had the best deal of any EU country, but he was only not allowed to get a break on FOM of Labour. Portraying it as a loss with the EU treating the UK badly is entirely erroneous, but politically expedient.
EU immigration doesn't have a major effect on wages, if it did it would be statistically evident, and it isn't. The Bank of England study has been held up by leavers as an example of the effects, but it actually shows the opposite of what they claim. Its also subject to regional variation! So areas with low levels of EU immigration are effected at an even lower level.
"I'm not racist but..." then go on to describe immigration using negative and aggressive langauge, some of you make references to "Enoch being right" and then complain that some leaver positions are being called racists and xenophobic?
Make hyperbolic and erroneous arguments and then complain that people think some leave voters are stupid?