Yes, do please come over to FWR if you're interested in this issue.
But back on point. Janice Turner (Times journalist) had a great twitter thread on this, and I'll repeat her question on that thread to you, MoreTroubleThanItsWorth.
What do you say to the girls?
These are girls who have trained for years, who are good enough to be in the state championships, who might aspire to a career as professional athletes, or be hoping to get to university with the help of funding from an athletics scholarship. They now have no "level playing field" on which to try to compete.
Regardless of the sincerity or otherwise of Yearwood or Miller's beliefs about their gender, Yearwood and Miller have male physiology (Miller was, until relatively recently, competing against boys, and all their and their parents public statements to date indicate that neither is taking blockers or cross sex hormones).
Basically, that's a whole load of girls' athletic ambitions crapped on from a great height.
So:
What do you say to the girl who came 3rd, who should have placed 1st?
What do you say to the girls who came 4th and 5th, who should have had medals but were bumped out of the medal spots?
What do you say to the girls who were 9th and 10th in the qualifying rounds, who should have made it to the final but didn't?
Why don't these girls matter? Why do only the physiologically male transgirls matter?