only don’t agree with girls not using protection and then having abortions on a regular basis to correct their “mistakes.” Or falling pregnant to trap someone and it not working so they get rid and move onto the next person they will try and trap
WTAF is this misogynistic bollocks?! Has anyone ever met a woman who's actually admitted to doing this? Who's said "I tried to trap him but it didn't work so I had an abortion"? And by that I don't mean you heard it from your cousin's mates sister. I'm not saying women can't be morally dubious, but I am 99.9% confident these examples are rarer than hen's teeth.
Also, a man can't be trapped into having a baby, unless she steals his sperm. When he ejaculates into a woman's vagina, condom-clad or not, he is knowingly risking a chance of impregnating her. And from that he is aware of his rights (or lack thereof) with regard to whether or not she keeps that baby. He could abstain if he doesn't want to get anyone pregnant - I know the thought of a man not getting his dick wet is very alarming to some, but that's the truth of it. Here's another idea - only have sex with women you trust to make decision compatible with your own beliefs. Again, heaven forbid a man actually gets to know someone before shagging them, I realise this is quite the ask, but hey, I'm just thinking of them!
Finally, these people who say "abortions are fine unless she uses it as contraception" (not possible BTW) how do you propose that is policed? Are we to just expect honesty from a women seeking an abortion on her reason for doing it? Would a doctor make a judgement on wether she's being truthful? Would it go to a panel? Who decides the terms and who decides the outcome for each individual?
Let's face it, that sounds like a lot of work a more money the NHS can barely afford. So why not just stick to the system we have now, which does not let us judge wether a woman's reason for an abortion is good enough or not. Or, even better, not make her give a reason at all.