Haven't RTFT but predict how it's gone. Good for Iceland. No idea why mutilating your perfect newborn baby for religious purposes is deemed acceptable. After all, nobody in the western world accepts the stoning if women but under sharia law it's perfectly acceptable. How about if I said my religious beliefs meant I had to remove my child earlobes, after all, just a flappy bit of skin, no use to anyone. And FGM is culturally important in many African countries but most people in the West find it abhorrent and is rightly an illegal practice.
But there are likely hoards of people calling people like me intolerant, who will tell me that their newborn didn't even cry when someone who want even medically trained ripped a part of his penis away, didn't feel a thing and so on. It's just depressing.
There will be others quoting health stats and ignoring those who said they are not really relevant in western cultures where hygiene standards are much higher.
What I don't get is if God didn't want your sons to have foreskins, why didn't he create them without one?