Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Insta Mum 3

999 replies

Babaloo88 · 13/01/2018 19:22

Why is the other thread closed?!? I was enjoying reading through it?!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 16:37

@MadameGrizzly

I think 4 hours without a break for a child working is pretty awful and I'd class 8 hours with just an hours break for a child horrendous. No way I'd allow my 6 year old to do that and I know for a fact she would not want to.

I'd quite happily let her play in our garden in pretty outfits while I took some photos though, that's normal for her and wouldn't seem like work at all. After my kids are in bed I'd be happy to sit and upload those pics to insta adding a few #ads for whichever company and get paid for it.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 16:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

FleaRiddenScruffBag · 10/04/2018 16:39

Yes, I noticed that MoD has been following this thread. Her last stories, since deleted, offered advice (?) to people who found themselves sad by comparing themselves to IGers; unfollow or delete the app for an hour, a day, as long as it takes to cure yourself of your problem!

Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 16:41

@FlyingBird

I read the article. It's based on French law (I think Italy is the same). It's not really relevant to the UK, unless our laws change.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 16:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MadameGrizzly · 10/04/2018 16:43

The difference being, a child model will receive their modelling income (plus interest!) at a later date.

An Instagram child probably won't have that autonomy because mummy and daddy will have spent it for them.

Wren42 · 10/04/2018 16:43

Interesting @sofialemon you would happily use your child and get paid taking photos yourself regardless of her privacy with no guidelines etc but not let her model for say next where there are strict rules in place. That seems a contradiction? But yes I get you don’t have a problem with the over exposure of kids being used in social media I just don’t understand why one is acceptable and one isn’t.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 16:48

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 16:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jamoncrumpets · 10/04/2018 16:51

Sofia

'I honestly don't think the majority of the insta accounts that feature kids do show huge amounts of "staged" content.

It's their everyday lives with a # added to the pic.'

You're, quite simply, wrong about this.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 16:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 16:53

@FlyingBird

I'd say the M&S ad is probably comparable in terms of it most likely would have been a full day shoot. I don't think they do a huge amount of shoots like that though anyway.

Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 16:56

@Wren42

It would be the actual work involved in child modelling and myself having no or little control of the content that I'd dislike.

I also don't see how modelling would benefit my child other than financially.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 16:59

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 17:01

@MadameGrizzly

I'd rather our whole family enjoyed a better lifestyle with a better work/life balance now than have potentially just one of my children earn money to use themselves at a later date.

I also feel child modelling (especially older children) would potentially be far more damaging to a child's mental health.

Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 17:03

@jamoncrumpets

How do you know I'm wrong? How can you possibly say that isn't the case for any of the children of instamums mentioned on here?

Wren42 · 10/04/2018 17:05

You would have control over something you didn’t find acceptable. The point is in both cases it’s adults dictating how these children are promoted not the actual person the photo or video is being taken of. Obviously I’m talking in business terms. In a certain account there is so much that would never be allowed into a magazine advert as so many health and safety laws are being broken not to mention other things. Eventually I think the uk will have new guidelines set out so hopefully these accounts will disappear.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 17:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jamoncrumpets · 10/04/2018 17:10

Because I have very good insider knowledge Sofia, and I know people that work in the SM realm.

Wren42 · 10/04/2018 17:11

It’s very clever how it’s been turned around to be about child modelling. Gosh I’m annoyed with myself for getting sucked into that. Very good distraction technique to try and take it away from a great discussion about what I believe is a valuable topic.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 17:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ABuckToothedGirlinLuxembourg · 10/04/2018 17:21

If you don’t want this thread to be pulled like the last one, then stop engaging in Sofia’s derailment tactics. Just ignore her!

Wren42 · 10/04/2018 17:24

Yes I have taken note and will not be engaging again. I like joining in with everyone.
Gettinstuffdoneinheels is a refreshing fun account and it features her

Sofialemon · 10/04/2018 17:24

My point re child modelling is that personally I can't think of anything much more exploitative than putting your child forward for modelling.

On this thread the majority of you seem to have no issue with child modelling (seemingly because the money goes to the child) yet obviously have a massive issue with children "being used to earn money" on insta.

MarvelleGazelle · 10/04/2018 17:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.