I think that as long as it is monitored and actions are taken to prevent the majority of women's seats being taken by trans women, it's not as big of an issue as it's being made out to be
What would be an acceptable number of males to have in a program that was designed to increase female participation in politics? 10 per cent? 20 per cent? 50 per cent? And how would it be 'monitored', given that the whole point of imposing self-ID is to ensure that there are no longer any objective grounds on which to define women?
Labour already have as a women's officer a 19-year-old man who prior to declaring his 'womanhood' was an MRA who trolled women-only events, and who is now opening trolling Labour women and threatening that he has access to their contact data. And there is not a damn thing any woman can do about this. Because this misogynist MRA is now a 'woman', based on his say-so.
Chimamanda was being too kind when she said 'transwomen are transwomen'. She, like most women, has no idea of the depth of the misogyny of many men who identify as 'transwomen', nor of the extreme misogyny that this entire ideology enables, by displacing women from the subject position within our own category of being and making it impossible for us to name reality.
Because women are not a reality anymore. No, we are a metaphysical idea that any man can claim. Men, meanwhile, will continue to be real. You won't see them ceding their political positions or anything else to trans-identified females. They'll be absolutely delighted to see the crimes of male rapists, murderers and paedophiles recorded in the female stats. And boy, do they absolutely love telling women that sex-based oppression isn't real (how can it be when 'sex' isn't real?)
'Transwomen' are men, and most of them are men who, far from having any affinity with women, are filled with hatred and envy for us. Women need to stop being so empathetic towards men who claim gender dysphoria. The vast majority have shown that they have no empathy with us.