Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trump 2018: Resistance is Never Futile

999 replies

lionheart · 29/12/2017 18:34

To pick up on the Star Trek motif.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
40
Lweji · 04/01/2018 22:54

To clean the drains you do have to get all the gunk out first.

Wasn't he going to drain something?

OhYouBadBadKitten · 04/01/2018 22:55

So who is buying the book? It's tempting, but I'm going to wait for reviews first.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 04/01/2018 22:57

I so hope we have this to look forward to:

Eric Boehlert
@EricBoehlert
hunch: GOP is massively overplaying its hand and its FBI crusade will soon morph into Benghazi noise. i.e. it'll become punchline for a joke abt a GOP waste of time.

shareblue.com/be-careful-what-you-wish-for-gops-bogus-dossier-investigation-about-to-backfire/

like GOP's Benghazi charade, they don't produce anything.

there's never proof of wrongdoing.

second hunch: when Mueller produces his report it's going to be so overwhelming, nobody's going to care about GOP cobbled-together attempt to discredit FBI

badbadhusky · 04/01/2018 22:59

I woukd save your pennies. All the good stuff will be reported in the media. (Caveat: if the shit is still flowing after a week, then buy it.)

PerkingFaintly · 04/01/2018 22:59

I think it's a bit more than that.

I hope so, cozie. Oh I do hope so.

badbadhusky · 04/01/2018 23:00

^ my post was for OYBBK.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 04/01/2018 23:03

Amy Siskind‏
@Amy_Siskind
One gets the sense that an awful lot of people who know full-well Trump is not mentally competent are allowing him to continue for their own advancement, despite knowing the damage and danger to the country. All must be held to account when this is over.

Also

The Atlantic‏
@TheAtlantic
"They know what is wrong with Donald Trump. They know why it’s dangerous." @JamesFallows on Washington's open secret:

www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/it-was-an-open-secret/549653/?utm_source=atltw

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 04/01/2018 23:08

Zoe Tillman
@ZoeTillman
NEW: A judge has denied Fusion GPS' request for an injunction blocking the House Intel committee from subpoenaing a bank for records about Fusion's financial transactions assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4343926/1-4-18-Fusion-GPS-Opinion.pdf

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 04/01/2018 23:35

Bannon's future at Breitbart uncertain after Trump book remarks: report

thehill.com/homenews/media/367495-bannons-future-at-breitbart-uncertain-after-trump-book-remarks-report?amp&__twitter_impression=true

cozietoesie · 04/01/2018 23:40

Just taking in some of the 'sidebarred' reports from the links. I never realised that missileers are tested 3 times a month.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 04/01/2018 23:41

Judd Legum
@JuddLegum
Some White House staffers leaked to Axios that they may fire Katie Walsh from her Super PAC for talking to Michael Wolff

Oops, you just admitted you are violating campaign finance law

thinkprogress.org/trump-may-be-violating-campaign-finance-law-bba42dd047cf

And

Citizens for Ethics
@CREWcrew
Katie Walsh works for a super PAC that is supposed to be independent from the White House. Why are White House officials discussing firing her?

cozietoesie · 04/01/2018 23:43

The Breitbart news is to be expected, Pain.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 05/01/2018 00:15

Indeed. Just as is the abundance of lies.

Stephanie Ruhle
@SRuhle
In her statement cutting ties with Steve Bannon, Rebekah Mercer said they have not been in contact for many months.
Meanwhile, a party goer tells me she hosted a cocktail party on October 18, 2017 at her Upper West Side home. Steve Bannon was a featured guest.

lionheart · 05/01/2018 00:48

More trouble for Trump and McGahn.

www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html?smid=tw-nytpolitics&smtyp=cur&_r=0

OP posts:
lionheart · 05/01/2018 00:49

With a follow up.

Michael S. Schmidt‏Verified account
@nytmike

Our reporting shows how an aide to AG Jeff Sessions asked a Hill staffer four days before Comey was fired whether staffer had derogatory information on Comey, as part of apparent effort to undercut FBI director's credibility

OP posts:
lionheart · 05/01/2018 00:54

'We are watching the political equivalent of the Weinstein board paying off the objects of his abuse. We are watching Fox pay out its tens of millions to O’Reilly’s victims. But we’re watching it in real time, with the secret shared worldwide, and the stakes immeasurably higher.'

www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/it-was-an-open-secret/549653/

OP posts:
cozietoesie · 05/01/2018 01:02

That article - and the 'sidebarred' pieces - are very thought-provoking.

OP posts:
GingerIvy · 05/01/2018 01:49

Michael S. Schmidt

Verified account

@nytmike
1h1 hour ago
EXCLUSIVE: Mueller's Investigation reveals details of how Trump had WH counsel lobby Sessions not to recuse; how a WH lawyer tried to mislead the president about whether he could fire Comey; Preibus notes corroborate some of Comey's claims. www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html?_r=0

GingerIvy · 05/01/2018 01:50

CA has already stated there will be no drilling off their shores. They have laws already in place.

GingerIvy · 05/01/2018 01:52

Norm Eisen

Verified account

@NormEisen
2h2 hours ago
Perhaps Trump’s greatest achievement across the aisle: he made Democrats support keeping Sessions! Any effort to remove him now is only to appoint a replacement to curtail Mueller, & so must be fought. www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/democrats-defend-jeff-sessions/index.html

GingerIvy · 05/01/2018 02:03

Manu Raju

Verified account

@mkraju
27s27 seconds ago
Rosenstein and Wray met with Paul Ryan yesterday in the hopes of swaying the speaker in DOJ's dispute with Nunes over dossier documents. But Ryan backed Nunes, and DOJ relented. w/@LauraAJarrett @evanperez www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/paul-ryan-nunes-justice-department/index.html

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 05/01/2018 06:11

Adam Parkhomenko
@AdamParkhomenko

  1. Trump says Huma should be jailed; calls DOJ to take action
  2. DOJ looking into Hillary’s emails, again.
  3. FBI Little Rock launches new Clinton Foundation investigation.
4: U.S. Attorney is former Huckabee aide.

2 days, 12 hours, 57 minutes.

GOP isn’t even hiding it anymore

These are the tactics Vladimir Putin uses against a former political opponent, their family, and staff.

Trump 2018: Resistance is Never Futile
OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 05/01/2018 06:17

More fuel for the hannitys?

White House Lawyer Who Reportedly Cautioned Against Comey Firing Used To Work For Comey

Uttam Dhillon advised President Trump that he had limited authority to fire former FBI director James Comey, according to a New York Times story published Thursday. Dhillon had worked for Comey a dozen years earlier, when Comey was deputy attorney general and fought back against perceived overreach from the White House Counsel's Office.

www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/chrisgeidner/white-house-lawyer-who-reportedly-cautioned-against-comey?utm_term=.rqKkjr6Lo&__twitter_impression=true

The White House lawyer who reportedly advised President Trump that he had limited authority to fire former FBI director James Comey has an unexpected background: He once worked for Comey.

Uttam Dhillon, who the New York Times on Thursday night reported had taken "the extraordinary step" in early 2017 "of misleading" President Trump about the circumstances under which he could fire Comey, has served in several Republican-led offices.

Prior to joining the White House, he worked for Texas Rep. Jeb Hensarling. More than a decade earlier, he had worked for then-Rep. Chris Cox. And, notably, in between those jobs, he served in the George W. Bush-era Justice Department, working for Comey, who was then deputy attorney general.

At the start of the Trump administration, however, Dhillon joined the White House Counsel's Office, led by White House Counsel Donald McGahn.

In that role, Dhillon, the New York Times reported, had a junior lawyer examine what grounds Trump would need to fire Comey. The lawyer, per the Times, concluded that — like any executive branch employee — Trump could fire Comey at will.

”Mr. Dhillon, who had earlier told Mr. Trump that he needed cause to fire Mr. Comey, never corrected the record, withholding the conclusions of his research," the Times reports.

The story asserts that Dhillon did so because he "was convinced that if Mr. Comey was fired, the Trump presidency could be imperiled" — because it could lead to the sort of investigation that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is now overseeing.

White House spokespeople did not immediately return a request for comment late Thursday about Dhillon's role in the White House counsel's office.

Before joining the White House in early 2017, Dhillon was chief counsel for oversight for the House Financial Services Committee under Hensarling, the committee's chair. Before that, he had worked for a law firm doing securities litigation in Dallas. Before that, he had been in DC, a part of the Bush administration.