Yes, that's exactly our point? That there are still social pressures around this
No, it being common and not questioned when it happens doesn't mean there is pressure (at least, there wasn't for me). It's simply that if I change my name, nobody bats an eye, but if my husband did, he'd get a lot of reaction. That doesn't mean he shouldn't do it, but it does mean that they're not equal actions and don't take place in a vacuum.
and that's why all the 'oh I just happened not to like my name anyway' is disingenuous.
As I've said before, my father was abusive so I have no reason to want to keep his name. It rhymed with 'fuck' as well. Yes, I could have changed my name sooner by deed poll but I'll be honest, that was costly and an administrative faff and would have caused more trouble than it was worth among my family (most of them don't know about the abuse). When I was getting married, though, I had a perfect opportunity to take another name without cost, to a man I actually chose and loved, and which sincerely works better with my first name.
Another woman chooses to keep her name, and that's equally fine, absolutely none of my business.
You make it sound like it's some unchangeable fact that societal attitude exists - but it's not, it's a construct that could disappear
Of course it could. But right now, it's very straightforward and doesn't raise any eyebrows. It's different for a man who changes his name, so I can understand why he might not want to even if the principle itself doesn't bother him.
I think more and more younger women are keeping their names now, so it may well be on the way out. I changed my name and I don't care if I'm the last woman ever to do so, I'm quite happy with my choice. If women in the future don't, that's no issue.
And you're not a woman who kept her name on marriage, so you're really not in a position to tell us how much hassle or surprise we do or don't get for it.
No, but I can promise you you'll get none from me. You don't seem to want to return the courtesy.