www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/07/misogyny-feminism-stop-the-war-jeremy-corbyn
Why I won’t shut up about misogyny and the left
Jess Phillips MP
Jan 2017
www.ft.com/content/07b304d4-4698-11e6-8d68-72e9211e86ab
The Labour party’s trouble with female leaders
The party has been trumped by the Tories on gender equality in leadership, writes Ayesha Hazarika
July 2016
That the party elected an all-male top team is not the fault of Mr Corbyn and Tom Watson, his deputy. But they then chose to give the top shadow cabinet jobs to men. Most of Mr Corbyn’s powerful key advisers are men. The general secretary is a man. Most of the key trade union bosses are men. All our mayors are men. Anyone spotting a theme?
The culture of the party has changed, too. There is a level of misogyny which should shock, but is now standard. “Remember the good old days when we used to get together to moan about the pay gap and childcare — now it’s all death and rape threats,” a female MP remarked darkly, referring to the abuse she encounters online.
www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2015/12/are-jeremy-corbyns-supporters-really-sexist
Are Jeremy Corbyn's supporters really that sexist?
Dec 2015
The last couple of paragraphs which almost justify abuse are quite something.
Then there is all the criticism about why Corbyn refuses to support the boycott of SWP events.
www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/10/corbyn-under-fire-speaking-anti-racism-rally-links-swp-socialist-workers-party
Corbyn under fire for speaking at anti-racism rally with links to SWP
Equality groups claim they were misled to believe the Labour leader had pulled out of event as they planned to air concerns
Oct 2016
All these articles contain women speaking out about the type of language used against them and why it is bad and saying they are not being heard.
And several of them state that the problem has existed for a while, but has got worse and has got nastier in its tone in recent times.
Some of it relates to relationships and the influence of Corbyn personally and how his backing has aided certain individuals OUTSIDE the norm structure of election or how he has changed the rules to favour people who perhaps are more sympathetic to him. Not hard to see how this centralisation of power might cause side effects - intended or not.
So of it is, also technologically driven as one of the articles above does point out. But Corbyn has been criticised over how weak his criticism has been in this area, because it has also aided him in establishing control of the party.
Point being there is an under current that was very much present BEFORE the election and really should have been a concern when it came to selection of candidates if there was a serious attempt at trying to improve the situation.
Incidentally, I know that the rush to get candidates in place was also an issue because the party did not address the problem earlier and could have. I know that even though it was said repeatedly that there wasn't going to be an election, the LDs put the party on notice in the Autumn of last year and told them to sort out as many candidates as possible just in case. Irony being that the Tories also failed on this score. Both parties were crippled by their internal feuding though.
There are lots more stories of this type.
There is a culture which is being flagged up and a theme throughout.
Whether or not its fair isn't necessarily the point. The point is the public perception is there.