OK then, so that all women are not 'financially vulnerable' after having children, what do you people going on about this actually suggest? That every single woman who is a mother carries on working full time?
No matter how much her kids need her, no matter how inconvenient it is, (for school hols, plays, sports days, sickness, illness, hospital, doctors, and dentists appointments for the kids,) and no matter that they are no better off because of having to pay nannies/childminders etc; she should just keep working so she is not 'financially vulnerable' if she and her husband split?
And every woman who carries on working after she has children, will be absolutely financially solid and solvent after the divorce, and will have 100% financial security, and will not be in the least bit 'financially vulnerable?'
Don't talk such shit. The vast majority of women before children AND after, are not very high earners, despite the claims on mumsnet that are made every day from some people (that they earn six figures and have a top rated professional job.) So even if they carry on working, they will often be in as much of a shaky financial position if they get divorced, than they would have if they had been a SAHM.
Anyone who claims any different is deluded.