MissEliza
There really are some ignorant and argumentative people on MN. It's very tiresome.
First, please don't be rude. I asked you a neutral, polite question. A neutral question is not "ignorant", and if anyone else disagrees with you that doesn't make them argumentative.
First of all, the school had a meeting at the beginning of year 10 warning us attendance was crucial and quoted research showing the impact a few days absence could make on grades. So they clearly regarded every day as important.
Your child was in isolation, he wasn't absent.
He missed a double science lesson and a maths lesson. It's pretty hard to study those subjects on your own.
Hard yes. That's why it's a punishment. If it was easy, it wouldn't be a punishment, would it? So he didn't miss any valuable learning, his learning experience was made harder through your decision to not have a back-up pair/not repair his trousers and ensure he attended school in the correct uniform.
It was completely stupid to put ds in isolation for his first infringement ever. I know there were some who kept pushing it so you need to come down heavy but not ds.
So you want preferential treatment for your child? I'd be interested to know what criteria you would expect teachers to use when they decide who has to abide by the rules, and who doesn't, using such incredible pupil-specific subjectivity.