AHedgehogCanNeverBeBuggered I'm far from a hippy but positive thinking and the placebo effect do count for something.
If you go into any setting saying "I will be vulnerable", "I am going to suffer", "This is going to be the worst thing I've ever done" then yes you are, and yes it will be.
Thinking like that also has a Catch 22 effect of increasing your adrenaline levels, which in turn can halt the progression of your labour.
Why is the only accepted post-birth expectation to be 'broken and vulnerable', and any woman who (as a PP said) wasn't the case for her at all is met with, "Well good for you
" reaction.
Women are in competition for so much anyway, why does childbirth and postnatal expectation have to be the same?
Just to clarify I have given birth before, including 1 back-to-back labour with 3rd degree tearing. It was fucking hellish.
But once it was over I guess my endorphins were sky high or the pethidine was still active?! and like another pp, I felt invincible, and couldn't wait for both mine and DH's family to meet DD.
Obviously everyone is different, and if you read my subsequent post to the OP, I said that I am in total agreement that you don't have anyone there that you're uncomfortable with.
It does seem though that you aren't welcomed as a new mother in certain places, unless you're resolute in the belief that as new mothers we all have to be weeping, bleeding and in a vulnerable state. And if your personal experience was less than that trauma, then you're viewed as being smug or a goady fucker.
The women who do feel great after the birth are at just the same risk of PND in the future, and will definitely still have the same exhaustion levels in the first few months.
It doesn't open up the avenues of communication for them, if they are judged to be smug for not being sad, vulnerable and weepy enough in the first few days.