I left DS (almost 3) and DD1 (almost 6) with their familiar GPs twice in one year - couldn't take them with me for two funerals on another continent of immediate family members.
They were not neglected - they were fed, washed, slept in comfy beds, played with cousins occasionally, watched tv, had the odd treat.
They were badly affected all the same. DS regressed in his toilet training and in many other ways - sleep and eating being two big ones that took a while to resolve, along with the toileting. DD1 had it a little easier but was not herself when I returned.
There is no way I would ever leave any baby or child except in a dire emergency. It is too much for the baby to handle, emotionally.
It's lovely to be non judgmental but we don't need to play stupid either PratStick
YYY to that. The baby does not know the grandparents from Adam. The baby cannot possibly comprehend what ten days is or that mum and dad will be coming back. The fact that the GPs insisted on this shows that they are not able to put the interests of the baby first, and that is reason to be very concerned. They want this experience for selfish reasons. The baby is not a toy.
exMIL left exH's youngest sibling with her parents at 3 weeks to go on a two week holiday with the rest of the family. She also bragged about never getting up in the night for any of her seven babies - this trained them to sleep through apparently. I make no bones about judging that.