I don't know how old you are, but there have been more unstable governments, especially in the 70s iirc.
The state we are in? There are posters saying we are a wealthy country. We have stable governments, we have the rule of law, we have the courts. we have freedom of assembly. We are not bloody N Korea or Zimbabwe fgs. The UK may not be a socialist utopia, (and we've seen how well that worked out), but I don't think we are in a 'state' by any means.
Any divisions have been there for a very long time, decades before the current government, and I hadn't noticed that the incumbents from 97-2010 did much about it. I disagree that no Leadership is being offered. Just because there isn't emoting all over Downing Street, doesn't mean that there isn't plenty going on behind the scenes.
Grenfell is and will be used - how dare you not see that? It doesn't matter to some on here that different governments of all stripes can potentially be held culpable here; it will be a bash the Tory government fest.
If you can't see that we're supporting all actions and events against Theresa May's attempt at forming a Government and organising a march to that end isn't profoundly undemocratic, given the outcome of the election, then perhaps you need to question your definition of democracy. There was a democratic election; the Tories gained the most seats in the House, they form the Government. It is undemocratic in the extreme to try and stop that, which is what the march was originally about.
it would be far better, and more respectful to have a march or vigil for Grenfell at a separate date, when the building is secured and the number of fatalities are known. It seems to me that anything else is piggybacking on people's grief, and that is distasteful in the extreme. To do it later would also serve the purpose of keeping it front and centre in the public consciousness, and keeping pressure on for other blocks to be retrofitted. Otherwise, the media circus will move on and Grenfell might get pushed to the edges.