I think it's so weird that these kinds of bands are made to appeal to young kids and yet they dress in such a sexual way. I mean, adults obviously aren't listening to their music (not many anyway) so why not dial it down a bit?
I'm all for women dressing how they want, but with a band like Little Mix, I don't think they have ANYTHING to do with their image/songs - they're just puppets. That's my issue with them.
Take someone like Nicki Minaj - I know she gets a lot of criticism for how she dresses but I don't think she is marketed directly to young children. And I feel like she is wholly in control of her look/her songs/ her brand. For me, no, I wouldn't let my kids see her until they were teenagers but it doesn't bother me to see a woman who is in control of her sexuality and her look.
It DOES bother me to see a band marketed to children dressing like that. It's a bit grim. I'm not really sure how I'd feel about a 9 year old seeing them.
There are a lot of posters talking about choice. Yes, choice is great, but these days it seems like the only way a woman can be successful is if she dresses in a very sexualised way. I think it's a really complicated issue and just saying 'it's a choice' is simplifying matters. Yes, there have always been women who dressed like that, but nowadays I think it's much more prevalent. If you look at, say, Bananarama videos, yes, sometimes they wore sexy stuff but they also wore a lot of jeans and t shirts. I wish there was more of a mix of styles like that.
Or that men were also wearing tiny shorts! Why is it always women who are exposed and sexualised?
I was pleased to see Ariana Grande wearing jeans and a jumper at the Manchester concert. She still looked stylish even though she was covered up.
It is a complicated issue and I'm not sure what I'd do in your position OP.