Any system is not going to work for everyone, I'm sure under every government there are people who felt cheated.
But, the underlying issue is that some people were taking the piss out of the benefits system. Two of the people on that link are clearly disabled and really shouldn't have had their payments taken away, another has a condition that I also have and although it does make life occasionally difficult, it doesn't prevent me from working and never has done.
I would much rather the system paid out more to those who were really in need and I think it usually does. I think targeting the payments at those most in need is a worthwhile strategy. Another example, DS2 has a mild auditory processing disorder and it was suggested that we fill in a DLA assessment to see if he could get government help - this has also happened to 2 friends who have children with ADHD who are completely manageable......why?
We get posts on here all the time which mention that people are better off not working and that isn't the point of a benefits system, it is meant to support those who haven't got a job in the short term and not be a means of income for those who chose not to work.
I personally know two people in our village who have been "forced" back to work, having lived off benefits previously.....benefits shouldn't be a choice.
Politics aside, if Jeremy Corbyn is voted in he will not get a good deal for the UK from Brexit and could potentially bankrupt the country leading to many more years of austerity.
Its not good for anyone having a weak labour leader, our country works best on the cyclical political cycle we have where conservatives lead for a few terms and then labour for a few. It prevents anyone getting too left/right wing. If JC gets in, it will damage our lovely country for decades.