Thanks all.
The suggestions that I put him elsewhere are a bit daft, sorry. I don't have the luxury of choice and I'm not moving a child who has never coped well with a change in childcare locations (room moves at nursery were traumatic and he spent the first two days of breakfast club and ASC crying
). I'm well aware discussing these issues with the staff may result in no change and we'll just have to lump it. And as for it being the cheap option...hardly. It's onsite, he gets to play with his friends, in a familiar environment with a beautiful outdoor area. We could afford a childminder, but no CM would give him that. Since a CM has come on here saying she gives crap food 'because that's all they'll eat' anyway, hardly instils me with confidence. And as for suggesting I just look after my own child...charming. I can't. So I would like to have some input into how he is looked after, if I see issues that I think could negatively impact on other children as well.
I'm comparing my own ASC experiences - a snack (an actual snack) was perfectly sufficient and 'down time' was a book on a beanbag. But to be honest, I recall mainly just heading straight outside again, in all weathers. I seriously question this insistence that 'down time' is required and that that can only come in the form of a screen.
Screens are an effective way of containing children so yes, Waddle, I do feel I need the TV at home to enable me to get ready unhindered in the morning and to keep them away from hot pans in the evening. If you have equally effective alternatives to keeping a 4 and a 2 year old out of my way and not trashing the house or each other, I would be genuinely interested in hearing them. Everything else I've tried results in crying, screaming, injuries, arguments, me being late and completely frazzled, small children trying to 'help' stir things in hot pans or me getting work clothes covered in snot/dribble/food, and at the very least a huge mess for me to deal with at the moment I need to get out the door.
To whoever mentioned Monopoly vs a screen, thinking a screen was comparable - Monopoly has so many advantages over a screen I don't even know where to start. Baseline movement is greater with any non-screen activity, even sedentary ones, added to which Monopoly has added social elements, fine motor skill requirements, computational skills....Monopoly every time over a screen.
No, before some wag suggests it, I'm not giving my children Monopoly instead of the TV at home to enable me to get ready/make dinner. DS2 is two, and not a staggeringly advanced two, either. It would end up spread from front door to garden and I'd be picking battleships and dogs out of radiators for years to come.
Thank you for the suggestions on how to broach it. It didn't occur to me that they perhaps limit the screen time so I'll check that (although I still don't think it's necessary at all with all the other options available). If there is no change in the food, I will consider sending him in with a snack, although I do think it's a bit isolating for him, and DS2 would get particularly upset if chips are on offer for everyone else because he's a beige-food dustbin when given half the chance. They are rated OFSTED 'Excellent' so how they got that with the food they serve, I have no idea.