As other posters have pointed out, in fact very few self-employed people are company directors driving tax-deductible Lamborghinis.
Over the last few years, many people have found themselves self-employed as a result of practices such as the introduction of zero-hour contracts.
And it can't be stressed enough that self-employed people do not have the same benefits as people who count as 'employed by a company' - e.g. no sick pay, no holiday pay, no maternity/paternity pay and no employers contributing towards their pensions.
Speaking as someone who is self-employed through choice, though not earning a lot of money, I can say I don't begrudge paying an extra 1 or 2% in NICs. However, DP and I are not on the breadline, we don't have children, we don't need to claim tax credits and we aren't applying for a mortgage. How can low-earning self-employed people manage if only a couple of those things apply to them?
I can imagine that self-employed people on low incomes who have not chosen to be self-employed but have effectively been forced in to it because no other work is available - e.g. certain taxi drivers - must be counting every penny and will be worrying about how they can pay this extra tax (I agree with pp that NICs ARE just tax by another name).
Totally agree with this: just wish that the govt had had the balls to get rid of NI and make one tax. but cant see anyone doing this in a hurry. always better to hide taxes and create new ones than to be honest and transparent about what this govt is costing us and whether or not we feel that what we pay across all of our taxes
I have never voted Tory in my life (and I am OLD
), but frankly I am puzzled as to why Philip "Pomposity" Hammond thinks this will go down well among Tory voters.