Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be disappointed that feminist Emma Watson has posed topless

634 replies

MutePoint · 28/02/2017 19:47

To promote her new film. Can't these A listers just wear a classy outfit?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Londonsburningahhhh · 08/03/2017 10:59

I am looking forward to it the guides and brownies have arranged it. It will be interesting to see how they put that together and what changes they've made.

Londonsburningahhhh · 08/03/2017 11:24

I read the telegraph and read what she said about Beyoncé what are you talking about. If you look for the telegraph article it will show you the original interview back in 2014 and she even took the time to highlight the parts where she spoke about Beyoncé. EW said that people took what she said out of context.

LassWiTheDelicateAir · 08/03/2017 13:04

I hate snakes. I have no empathy for anything snakes

What a bizarre comment. You have a phobia about snakes. I doubt snakes, particularly anacondas, have done anything to harm you. No reason at all to justify the killing of an anaconda for Beyoncé's personal vanity. It's just as bad as wearing fur.

HollywoodStunt · 11/03/2017 20:48

What a bizarre comment. You have a phobia about snakes. I doubt snakes, particularly anacondas, have done anything to harm you. No reason at all to justify the killing of an anaconda for Beyoncé's personal vanity. It's just as bad as wearing fur.

Best comment on the entire thread Lass

NotCarylChurchill · 12/03/2017 10:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

NotCarylChurchill · 12/03/2017 10:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BillSykesDog · 12/03/2017 10:48

It wasn't fake news. Emma Watson has posted the interview on Twitter herself. She was interviewing another performer. She criticised Beyoncé and said she was 'conflicted' about Beyoncé performing for the male gaze. They interviewee contradicted that and Watson massively backtracked when pulled up on it. But she did say it. Then when her interviewee didn't slavishly agree with the self appointed representative of feminism's interpretation rather than sticking by her views she did her normal hypocritical 180 degree about face. Because her principles seem to be based on saying what she thinks people want to hear rather than any sense of conviction.

It was a bit embarrassing as rather than defending her point she just collapsed as soon as the interviewee disagreed. There was some very patronising borderline racist wittering on about how Beyoncé was performing for her husband which challenged assumptions that African Americans don't have monogamous relationships (really? We need a celebrity couple to show us that African Americans have monogamous relationships? Because we couldn't possibly actually know a monogamous African American couple in real life?). However she completely dropped her point about the 'voyeuristic' 'male gaze' as soon as it was challenged by some nonsense about her being performing for her husband. She could have defended her initial position by pointing out if you stick it on a music video by definition you're not just performing for your husband. Or that other men watching a woman 'perform' sexually for her husband is the very essence of voyeurism. But she didn't. Because at the very least her convictions are deeply fluid. At worst an entirely false affectation.

WhataHexIgotinto · 12/03/2017 12:41

I really struggle with the idea that one 'respects' someone or not because of the clothes they choose to wear.

OutwiththeOutCrowd · 12/03/2017 15:46

Emma Watson has had the contents of a giant tube of toothpaste squeezed out onto her top half in decorative loops - and she has managed to keep a straight face long enough for a picture to be taken. That’s more than I could manage.

The photo might be Art but it is, at the same time, an image that partly reveals a female erogenous zone and as such it will inevitably be at least mildly titillating to a certain section of the populace. (I doubt that Emma was thinking about it in this way though.)

I’ve been trying to think of a male equivalent to Emma - an obviously good-looking high-profile individual who wants to be taken seriously on the world stage but who might be tripped up by their own beauty.

Justin Trudeau comes to mind.

Here he is in his youth doing the demi-boob pose. He has had some difficulty rising above his pretty boy image yet still seems to be a sucker for a good photo op, even now that he’s running a country.

Of course, it’s not quite the same. Male breasts are less taboo – or at least this has been the case historically so there is less of a sense of being unusually exposed. And he is, moreover, in a position of real influence. As a consequence, his publicity shots seem more peripheral to who he is and less likely to swamp his identity.

To be disappointed that feminist Emma Watson has posed topless
New posts on this thread. Refresh page