It's insulting to all the decent men and fathers out there to suggest they need a woman enabling to do a job that's meant to come natural to a female.
This isn't about basic parenting, it's the especially difficult nature of the daughter's condition. The OP has said she has no concerns about him as a father to their eldest.
I married one of those great men and fathers. As he was unable to come to a lot of the appointments, he usually had a little less insight into our son's condition. As he had less practice, he was less adept at giving a baby their meds from a syringe.
I enabled my husband to try to give or son his meds by passing on what I'd been taught at the hospital as opposed to obtuse comments like 'find out yourself.'
As for he was out earning a living what does he want a medal?
Probably recognition for the role he played supporting his wife and children. Recognition isn't the right word but I'm not sure what is. I guess what I'm saying is that he shouldn't be derided for performing one task whilst the poster here did another. Without him, they wouldn't have had money to survive. Without her, the children wouldn't have been looked after. Neither is more laudable (in my opinion, clearly not yours) than the other.
Well my husband works full time but every time our baby has needed to go to the doctor, he's actually been there. The result is that he is just as competent to look after her in all ways as I am.
DH and I work full time. There have been occasions when one of us, for unavoidable reasons, have been unable to be at the hospital when needed. For one of those instances, I was in court as a professional witness in a child protection case. Did I 'actually fail', by your standards?
And if he hadn't been, he would have asked me what happened and found out what to do.
You assume, as he's "actually been there" every time.