I haven't read all the posts, so forgive me if I am covering the same ground as others.
My understanding is that there are two aspects to his case. One is more closely liked to his Aspergers / high functioning autism than the other.
The first relates to the Kafkaesque situation of being extradited to another country without knowing the details of the crime you have been accused of or the evidence against you. This is because of an imbalance in the extradition treaty that should concern all of us. It is a situation brought upon us by our own government that feels almost like a form of treason - a breach of the social contract between citizens and government.
When someone is tried at home they have their support network around them - a home, family etc. If they are extradited to a country where they have no family and no home, and where they have no means of supporting themselves then very few people will have the financial ability to apply for bail. This means that they are incarcerated in a foreign country where they received no visitors and (despite sharing a language) may struggle with the cultural differences.
Laurie Love, as someone with autism, has areas of ability and disability. He sounds articulate and, in this regard, if he has committed a crime then he should be tried and serve the sentence for it. However, the justice system should also make allowances for disabled people to ensure that they are not discriminated against during the trial process, so that they are fit to stand trial and defend themselves.
He still lives at home and appears to live a very quiet life. It is possible that he would struggle to care for himself without his mother's constant presence (something that would not be possible if he was extradited). It is also probable that the noise and the large number of people in a prison environment would be particularly hard for him to process. People with autism can be at higher risk of suffering from anxiety, depression and suicidal feelings.
I don't know the details of the case and what exactly is and isn't known, but, having heard the BBC interview, I am of the view that his trial should be held here and, if found guilty, his sentence should be served here too. He has never been to the US, so if he committed a crime, he committed it on British soil. We have a highly regarded justice system that is not dissimilar from America's. There is no reason to extradite him.
Quite frankly, the US ought to be able to make their secure servers un-hackable. Then these things won't happen. It seems bizarre that a British loaner should go through this circus when there are probably thousands of people employed by various countries hacking away with impunity.