"See, there you go again, lowering the tome of the discussion to one of attempting to ridicule someone with an alternative view."
Which you do repeatedly, but why would being a UKIP voter be ridicule? You deWrong.
"Anti EU. Pro controlled migration, forms my own opinions rather than utilising Google search, cut and paste - bingo, which is your preferred approach. finately embody their views."
I don't just go into google to find stuff that embodies my views, I have read a vast amount on this subject as it is one of the major ones of our day. I back my points with the use of data and sources because one of the first thing anti immigration people start saying is "you can't prove that" so I link to my sources to validate my point further. Its an academic practice.
Even in your response to my comment about your knowledge of trade agreements you don't manage to analyse an effect propiosal to the contrary other than we can negotiate our own and better trade agreements, when precednet shows that this is unlikely.
Your conflating your argument with the Hugenots they would be classed as refugees not economic migrants.
"stop clicking on outdated research"
The UCL report is the most comprehensive study on immigration in the UK conducted so far, its conclusions have been extensively peer reviewed and found to by largely correct, and it was published last year. The Oxford Universtiy data finishes in the year end September 2015. How is this out of date?
You presented yourself as the wronged here,, yet have been using ad homs and goading others all the time.
I think you can't take it that I'm winning the argument.