In our own particular version of democracy, the government is chosen by a relatively small percentage of voters, to represent those particular voters.
One person, one vote is a democratic voting system. Everyone has a right to persuade others to their point of view. If they fail to do so it means that their views have been rejected.
Remember Theresa May's "go home" vans? The government spent a huge amount of money advertising their crackdown on illegal immigrants. Do you also believe, in the interests of fairness and representing the entire electorate, that they should have spent an equal amount of money funding a campaign for all illegal immigrants to be given indefinite leave to remain in the UK?
Why would you want to campaign for illegal immigrants to stay who, are by that very definition, illegal? An illegal immigrant is not part of the electorate - they have no vote. They are part of another country's electorate while they are here illegally in this country.
What about the much-maligned "bedroom tax"? Do you believe the Department for Work and Pensions should have put forwards both in favour of and against their own policy?
The Government does fund NGOs and charities that do present an alternative view.
What about the junior doctor's strike? Do you think Jeremy Hunt should be saying, "on the one hand, junior doctors are lazy little gobshites who don't want to work weekends and don't care if people die as a result, but on the other hand, I am a duplicitous arsehole who has deliberately twisted the facts to mislead the public, oh and by the way, I want to privatise the NHS"?
Don't be absurd
I think you are the one who is being absurd.
I am quite happy for the Govt to post its leaflet.
It will do a lot more harm than benefit to the Remain campaign .
People will tell me how unfair they think it is.
I will not attempt to dissuade them from their views. As you said there is no obligation on one side to present the views of the others.
I will just smile and thank Cameron for assisting the leave campaign