"Sitting back and doing nothing will allow daesh to flourish in a foreign land"
REALLY?? I am really struggling with the black and white attitude of so many posters who think our choice is airstrikes vs nothing. Seriously, who has said we should sit back and do nothing?? Find me one person.
There are many other military strategies the govt could take alongside or instead of bombing Syria which the govt has not mentioned to my knowledge.
I personally don't agree with the bombing based on the info we have on the govt's strategic approach (or lack thereof).
It's hardly giving away military secrets to confirm they will work with /put pressure on others to aim to cut off trade in oil, arms etc and secure borders is it.
I believe the govt will benefit from airstrikes in terms of having a place at the table, and I suppose that may not be all bad, for them...
As for Syrian displaced/ refugees, they have left mostly because of Assad not Daesh, so why would they go back when there is no support for them??