Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

about SIL breastfeeding issue? Wedding related!

999 replies

SilverSalmon · 05/05/2015 13:08

I'm getting married in 5 weeks and there'll be 6 children at the wedding - 2 small babies and 4 toddlers. Next to the room where we're getting married is another room they use for smaller ceremonies, I asked if they could leave the door open for this in case people need to take out crying/tantrumming children (including my own 4yo DS!). They've agreed and will put sofas and a toy box in the room.

We were at my OH's parents at the weekend and his DB and wife were there. They are bringing their 2 children, our niece (4 months) and nephew (3yo) to the wedding. I told her about the room and said that I can get them sat near it just in case they need to pop out and settle or feed them (she's breastfeeding both). She said that if they need to feed she can just pull her dress down as its low cut, but I said she'll probably be more comfortable in the room as the seats are squahsed close together and may incur a lot of faffing. I've said the same to my cousin who is bring her 2 month old, who is bottle fed (and told SIL-to-be this).

Can I state at this point I'm very pro-breastfeeding, i breastfed DS until he was 2 years old, often in public, and would never ever adopy a 'there's a time and a place' attitude - however having breastfed a child of varying ages I know what a faff it can be especially when they're across your lap when someone is right next to you, so I gave the room idea as I thought it would be more comfortable for them and the children.

This morning OH has received the following email from his DB (names changed obviously):

Hi DB
Laura (SIL-to-be) and I have been discussing the issue of breastfeeding at your wedding and the fact she's been asked to go into another room if she needs to feed during the ceremony. I have to say I'm disappointed in you both as I thought you were pro-breastfeeding. Laura feels very vicitimised by this and we suspect it's because other guests may feel uncomfortable. In which case that's their issue, if they are offended by breasts being used for their natural function then they are welcome to turn their heads. Or, if it's like SilverSalmon says, and it's just for our comfort, we believe it would be easier to just get the children latched on rather than make the fuss of getting up and leaving the room.

I think it may be a good time to also mention that, as you know, Laura tandem feeds and because DS is still feeding when she latches DD on he usually comes up asking for some too. Meaning that it's highly likely that she'll need to tandem feed at various points during the day. We're happy with this and she has chosen a tandem-feeding friendly dress for this reason. Laura is not prepared to be shoved into a side room like she's doing something sordid, she wants to be part of the day too. So wether it be during the ceremony, dinner, speeches etc, she will need to tandem feed and is not prepared to leave the room to do it. I have to put the comfort and needs of my wife and children first. If you're not happy with this arrangement I'm afraid we won't be able to come - I'm not having any of us penalised because of our feeding choices. None of us would enjoy a day where the children and Laura are constantly seperate from me and the feeding is non-negotiable. It's up to you 2 but can you let us know asap and then we do things like cancel the hotel room and return our outfits. I hope you understand our point of view, I don't want to fall out with you but I didn't think breastfeeding would be such an issue!"

So mumsnet AIBU to be upset about this? I genuinely thought I was being helpful when I offered a side room for the ceremony. Help!

OP posts:
BigBirthdayGloom · 06/05/2015 18:09

Mine fed til then but to be honest, they and I were happy with privacy and discretion. No desire to be noticed by anyone and hence usually out of sight.

Ratherworriedmum · 06/05/2015 18:16

I'd find your reply unwelcoming, op. It has a nasty tone to it, which implies your sil will only be comfortable if she can feed "ostentatiously" to borrow Farage's description. Or she uses the room you have provided. I think you've now made it impossible for her to do as she probably intended all along, attend your wedding, feed her children as and when needed with minimal fuss and celebrate with you.
In her shoes I'd be hurt, and angry. Breastfeeding, especially into the toddler years, requires a lot of commitment and a certain amount of bloody mindedness to go against what has become our cultural norm, of course she's sensitive.

DixieNormas · 06/05/2015 18:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SoldierBear · 06/05/2015 18:25

Laura doesn't sound sensitive at all.
She does sound very insensitive towards anyone else though.
And given the very hostile and aggressive email they sent the response is much nicer than they deserve.

MissingYouSoMuch · 06/05/2015 18:30

In her shoes I'd be hurt, and angry. Breastfeeding, especially into the toddler years, requires a lot of commitment and a certain amount of bloody mindedness to go against what has become our cultural norm, of course she's sensitive

Oh FGS..... it's a bloody half hour (if that) wedding ceremony..... am sure three year old will cope. I am pro BF but would take a very dim view if someone pulled their dress down and insisted on tandem feeing a toddler and a baby in the middle of my wedding. This whole thing is just beyond ridiculous. She and her wet DH need to get over themselves.

oddfodd · 06/05/2015 18:31

I'd certainly agree that there's a lot of bloody mindedness on this thread which has only served to confirm every single extended breastfeeding stereotype. So well done you!

Hillingdon · 06/05/2015 18:32

This is why I didnt have children at our wedding!

It becomes all about what they want and the noise they make. The parents who sit near the front and who refuses to take out a wailing child. My SIL had a childminder booked to whisk the kids away during the church service.

As expected even though she had specifically said this was going to happen and did anyone have any issues with it some did (and were the ones who spolit the service because after all it was all about THEM!).

Sorry, I think your SIL is a self absobed twit who wants to be the centre of attention herself and stuff anyone else.

oddfodd · 06/05/2015 18:36

Hillingdon- I have always been v pro kids at weddings but this thread has given me the absolute fear.

MissingYouSoMuch · 06/05/2015 18:39

Yes, I agree Oddfodd

UptheChimney · 06/05/2015 18:44

OP your Bil and Sil belong in that other thread about entitled people. Someone needs to tell them the wedding is not all about them. It's about you and their brother. YANBU

You're very thoughtful to arrange a quiet room for parents with small children or babies who need a break. Hope you have a lovely day.

devon004 · 06/05/2015 18:45

Its not just the ceremony though is it. There is a reception too.

sleeponeday · 06/05/2015 18:46

Breastfeeding, especially into the toddler years, requires a lot of commitment and a certain amount of bloody mindedness to go against what has become our cultural norm, of course she's sensitive

Sure, but part of being an adult is not inflicting your own sensitivities on other people. Most especially on their wedding days. She seems not fully apprised that her SIL's wedding day is not, in fact, about her.

sleeponeday · 06/05/2015 18:51

I'm an extended breastfeeder too, BTW. But I'm also someone who realises that my children, and by extension myself as Mother, are not, in fact, the centre of the entire universe.

spiney · 06/05/2015 18:52

....of course she's sensitive

Lucky the actual bride isn't so sensitive, given the email that BiL/SiL sent......

spiney · 06/05/2015 18:53

Mind you ...she has posted on here..

PterodactylTeaParty · 06/05/2015 19:00

Hillingdon - sorry, your SIL had a childminder booked to whisk any noisy kids out during the service? Not her own kids, but the kids of guests at her wedding? Am I understanding that right?

alwaysstaytoolong · 06/05/2015 19:02

You just don't need to tandem feed in a short wedding ceremony. Four month old might need to but a three year can wait and has the cognition to understand that.

SIL and BIL are being self absorbed and ridiculous. They're making a point about something that doesn't need to be made.

And I get really annoyed by people using emotive and serious terms such as 'victimised' when they clearly don't understand the meaning of the word.

I'd tell them not to bother coming and not because of the BF issue but because they've been complete pricks. No one that I am close to would ever send such a ridiculous, insightless and frankly ludicrous email. It speaks volumes about them.

Koalafications · 06/05/2015 19:37

Does anyone know the age a child is able to BF to? When do they loose the ability to latch?

DixieNormas · 06/05/2015 19:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

CultureSucksDownWords · 06/05/2015 19:39

Depends on the child, Koala, I think, but it's around the time that milk teeth start to fall out - 5 ish onwards?

Koalafications · 06/05/2015 19:40

Ok, so a child couldn't BF beyond that point?

Hillingdon · 06/05/2015 19:40

My SIL didn't have any children! She didn't want her wedding spoilt by the many entitled people who think that the wedding is actually all about them...

leedy · 06/05/2015 19:41

"Ok, so a child couldn't BF beyond that point?"

Yup. They can't latch on.

Hillingdon · 06/05/2015 19:41

Its still ok to get married before you have children isn't it?

DixieNormas · 06/05/2015 19:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.