Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be uncomfortable that my heterosexual friend is volunteering for lgbt kids charity?

453 replies

travellingbird · 25/04/2015 14:08

My friend has to be the most conscientious person. She is exceptionally engaged with social issues and currently works in a lefty cause (climate change). She told me she was about to start with a work-approved charity for LGBT young people in schools. The aim is to go into schools and address homophobia and gender stereotypes etc. She is hetero and cis. I'm gay, and she has been one of my closest friends even before I came out at 15. She has witnessed and supported me through my battles with homophobic parents. Our mutual best friend is also gay and identifies as agender.
She is well aware of her privilege (in a good way) and has aired her concerns about not being quite right for it, yet is proceeding.

So, am I unreasonable to be uncomfortable with her taking this role? Should I just be happy she is er, "helping us" and being a wonderful ally?

OP posts:
hobNong · 26/04/2015 11:51

And I don't think you can say use both terms or use neither. They are not all encompassing. A person is not either trans or cis.

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 11:58

Do you define some people as trans-women or let them define themselves as just women?

I have no problem with them self describing as women. Of course, there may be situations where that might not fit their purpose.

Charis1 · 26/04/2015 12:01

transwomen can call themselves women all they like. They are never going to be the same type of woman. In a situation where the difference matters, they are transwomen, not women.

That does not make it acceptable to insult and belittle the rest of use by calling us "cis"

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:12

Glad some of you are not trans allies going into schools to talk about trans issues.

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 12:18

Why Orlando?

'Transwoman' is a self-applied label, 'Ciswoman' isn't.

Alienating a large proportion of (probably otherwise sympathetc) born-women with clumsy terminology that gives offence is in no-one's interests.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:29

Why?

If it takes a word like "cis" to alienate you, then you probably don't understand nor are sympathetic about trans issues. There are many people on here who are supportive of LGB issues but not T. And if it just takes one word to alienate you, then I don't want you as a trans ally.

SoupDragon · 26/04/2015 12:36

If it takes a word like "cis" to alienate you, then you probably don't understand nor are sympathetic about trans issues.

Nonsense.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:44

I rest my case.

Men don't say to women "I would be a feminist but please change your language"

White people don't tell black people the language to use.

For such a small group, trans people generate a lot of hostility. Young people are more tolerant than older people.

And no - quite frankly, I do not want a trans ally who is alienated by a word.
There is enough hate and misunderstanding of trans people (just look on here) without people saying "well, I support trans people but some of them use the word "cis" so they can fuck off"

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 12:45

If it takes a word like "cis" to alienate you, then you probably don't understand nor are sympathetic about trans issues.

What piffle.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:48

You know how men react when a feminist tells them something.

It's a bit like the previous 2 posts. Dismissal of what the feminist says.

Mrsjayy · 26/04/2015 12:48

Im ignorant what does cis mean

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:49

And it tells me enough about their views of trans issues and their understanding.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:50

Cis is a word some people use to describe people who do not identify as trans.

It comes from Latin.

JanineStHubbins · 26/04/2015 12:51

It is not transphobic or belittling of trans issues to reject the hateful label of 'cis'.

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 12:52

White people don't tell black people the language to use.

And no - quite frankly, I do not want a trans ally who is alienated by a word.There is enough hate and misunderstanding of trans people (just look on here) without people saying "well, I support trans people but some of them use the word "cis" so they can fuck off"

Well, let's look at some 'ally' situations from history, such as white freedom riders and white anti-apartheid campaigners. What would have been gained by saddling them with an unnecessary and diminishing appellation?

It IS an alienating thing to do.

hobNong · 26/04/2015 12:52

But cis is a word you're using to describe non trans people. It isn't a word used by trans people to describe themselves. Surely I have the right to object to a label put on me by others

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 12:54

You know how men react when a feminist tells them something.

It's a bit like the previous 2 posts. Dismissal of what the feminist says.

Oh, so I'm not a feminist because you disapprove of my feminism?

THAT is dismissal.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:55

But cis is a word you're using to describe non trans people

Am I?

I don't use it. The person on this thread who used it is not a trans person. Other people who use it are also non trans

I would much rather have someone like her as a supporter than other people.

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 12:55

Charis is probably the best qualified person on the thread to give a proper definition of 'cis' Mrsjayy

JanineStHubbins · 26/04/2015 12:57

Why don't you use the word 'cis', Orlando?

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 12:57

buxhoevden

Nice twisting of words.

You dismissed a trans person's point of view with the word piffle.

In the same way a man dismisses a feminists point of view with a put down.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/04/2015 13:00

janine

Why? Because I've had a lot of discussion on the feminist boards.
It's a great way to have an argument derailed because people pick up on that word and focus on it.

I also don't use in day to day life because I have no need to.

I don't use it on here because I am sick to the back teeth of the trans threads, the hate, lack of understanding and sympathy and the obsession some people have with a small group of people. So I don't discuss trans issues anymore.

infiniteregression · 26/04/2015 13:00

I see your point, but who best to take kids through the difficulties of being lgbt in a largely straight world than a sympathetic straight person who is close friends with a gay person? Your straight pal accepts and loves you irrespective of your sexuality, isn't this exactly the kind of relationship we want to show is healthy and normal? Perhaps it would be a good idea for you to go along with her one day and discuss how your friendship works with the kids so they can see being straight and being lgbt are both normal and fine and no barrier to good relationships.

Buxhoeveden · 26/04/2015 13:01

You dismissed a trans person's point of view with the word piffle.

No. I dismissed the specific notion that "If it takes a word like "cis" to alienate you, then you probably don't understand nor are sympathetic about trans issues." with the word piffle.

I'm not going to feel obliged to agree with anything a trans-person might say, purely because they are trans.

lucycant · 26/04/2015 13:01

Cis is not used to describe non Trans people. It is used to describe people whose biological sex and gender identity matches. Which cuts our virtually all feminists.

Swipe left for the next trending thread