I haven't been stirring. I have made it quite clear at all times that personally, I don't think much of people of either sex who are with someone for the lifestyle that they can provide them with, and who do nothing for themselves.
I have made it equally clear that I do not apply this to SAHMS specifically, as I don't see those who have had jobs or at least done something for themselves before having children as falling into that category at all. I fully respect people who admit to enjoying time at home after establishing some level of financial security, or who do voluntary work (proper voluntary work, not just once every six months to make themselves feel good), or sport or whatever.
And it has only been those militant type of SAHMS who cannot see this distinction and who like to put words in people's mouths. I also find these pronouncements on the harm that working mothers supposedly do to their children, highly ridiculous. That's condemning more half the mothers of Britain.
I have also made clear its a personal view - if someone has never worked or provided for themselves in their life, or bothered to do anything at all interesting, but instead has devoted themselves to obtaining and keeping a partner to pay for them, don't be surprised if other women see through you. Many women can and do after all have children, to base your whole sense of self worth around it is I think a bit outdated these days.
But since you think everyone who isn't a SAHM isn't worth bothering with, it won't concern you, will it? You'll be too busy nurturing to even post, surely?