So what, women should just suffer, elephant? That's too defeatist.
No, but complaining serves no purpose unless you are willing to make it personal, public, and name and shame specific midwives in the papers and on the TV. If a bad MW had to defend herself publicly and sue you for defamation of character, because you told the world she was a cunt, then maybe over time MWs would learn to treat people like human beings.
Alternatively, allocate a single midwife to each patient, and force that MW to stay with the same patients all the way through their care, in all circumstances. Stop chopping and changing. Then get the patients to fill in score cards at the end of their stay, and if a MW gets say three 'very poor' in a week, or ten in a month, discipline her, and sack her for repeated failures.
You see we live in a world now where absolutely no one can ever be sacked or disciplined for being shit at their job. No one gives a F if your MW is shit. Only you, and only for as long as you're in there, and you'll get over it.
Until we get away from this nanny state where everyone is entitled to job security and protection against 'unfair treatment', we will inevitably end up with the worst of employees gravitating to the least effective institutions.
So you have shit teachers, shit medical staff, AHs in the DSS, etc. none of whom would ever be able to exist in the private sector.
Bottom line is we get what we pay for.
A midwife on this thread has explained she sees twice as many patients as she used to and can't give them enough time. So it follows that, yes, more staffing would help. And obviously, more training to get rid of terrible attitudes.
You can have twice as many MWs with twice the training, but are you willing to pay for it? You personally? Are you willing to lose an extra 9.8% on your family income to improve the NHS? Most people are not. They think it should all come from the magic money tree.
That means more funding, and the question of where that comes from is a political one. That doesn't mean it's not possible, you just have to do what any interest group does and force the politicians to get off their asses. Public shaming of hospitals might help too.
A good side step. Yes, magic money tree money works every time. I have never seen anyone admit that they are willing to cut spending and increase taxes to solve a problem.
There is already talk of using bank fines to pay for NHS expansion, it doesn't have to be ordinary taxpayers that pay more.
Companies don't pay tax or pay fines, people do. Taking money from a company only harms people. But sure, I'd be happy for all those muppets who are saving for retirement to take a haircut on their pension pots, to see high street bank staff cut further, and to clip the dividends of shareholders. But I'd be willing to bet if you punish the banks, the person who gets hurt is the useless cashiers in the high street banks, and the lowly middle class pension saver who has been saving for decades, and now has 10% wiped off his nest egg.
This is why I'm so angry that MN refuses to campaign on this issue. Mothers are not an organised group, we need someone to lobby for us.
Why do you need someone to lobby FOR you? Why don't you lobby for us? You see, I do not believe the solution can be found without destroying the NHS. It is a monopoly, and like all monopolies, it produces a very poor product at a very high cost, and everyone employed by the NHS has a vested interest in keeping the monopoly going.