That statement is total BOLLOCKS!
- they said they have taken into consideration the public statement of Evans 'acknowledging the destructive nature of the acts, which led to his conviction'.
Have I missed something, because I have not heard any acknowledgment of this? Only an apology to his girlfriend for his 'infidelity' - but he wasn't convicted for being 'unfaithful to his girlfriend' was he?
- More specifically, the Club considers rape, the crime for which Mr Evans was convicted, to be a heinous crime worthy of serious punishment as provided under law. The Club has been assured by Mr Evans that he shares these value judgements.
So they accept that Evans is a convicted rapist, but also say that he knows that rape is a heinous crime, even though he thinks he isn't a rapist, even though he is a convicted rapist? They might as well say 'of course Mr Evans thinks rape is a heinous crime, but only if the perpetrator jumped out of a bush with a knife, and the lady (who of course was stone cold sober) tried to push him off and screamed NO'.
- . In a nation of laws, served by an elected parliament and duly constituted courts of law, there can be no place for 'mob justice'.
Unless of course, that 'mob' is the criminal's friends and family, on behalf of the criminal (who lets not forget has never condemned or apologised for the actions of those people) harassing a victim to the point of her having to change her identity twice. Then it's more of a grey area.
In fact the whole of that section 3 reads as if SU are somehow obligated to take back Ched Evans by law or something. They are not. They could say 'oh do fuck off dear' and be done with it.