You know what? The hypocrisy on this thread, so pissed off with the BS from salmond & his dangerous lies, is astounding. Those so faithful to facts & 'independent views' have managed to guess & speculate on the stance of AAM without any reference whatsoever to any fact or evidence to support their speculation. That's some feat in the space of a couple of posts. Bonnie Greer was right in what she said last night - why is this one view opposing the majority not being delved into in more detail? Why is there a need for the idle speculation when there are no facts to either explain their view or debunk their position?
One linked story to them being fined by the FCA when just a few googles on RBS/Lloyd's/Standard life, to name just a few of the opponents to the yes vote, show there are very few involved on the opposite side are without blemish/fines from the FCA.
What has been spectacularly absent from this debate for the past 2 years, on both sides, is any sober, rational, measured discussion on the key issues. Plenty of smoke & mirrors, though. And hysteria. Cris is right to ask for the rhetoric to be toned down, it's really unhelpful.