I used to argue vigorously against the concept, but increasingly, I am starting to realise that the probability is actually quite high that there is one lurking on every corner.
The whole situation's pretty grim really, isn't it? I didn't experience any sort of sexual assault as a child, and feel like I am part of a teeny, tiny minority. I have experienced all sorts of so-called low-level sexual assault as an adult, but that is entirely par the course, as a woman.
Someone said upthread that they're pretty sure people wouldn't turn a blind eye today. I don't think that's true.
I think the default position very much is still to turn a blind eye. Especially if the perpetrator is someone you (generic) know. The reaction is to disbelieve the child.
Look at people's initial reactions to Rolf Harris. Rolf Harris? Beloved children's entertainer?! Nooo, can't possibly be true...! Look at the total slating Vanesse Feltz took. Even Woody Allen - so many people assume Dylan Farrow is lying, and Woody couldn't possibly have dne the things he did.
And these men are strangers... They're strangers to us, and yet the public is far more ready and willing to believe them over their victims. So unfortunately, I do still think people woud rather turn a blind eye, especially when it's someone they know being suspected or even accused...
There is a lot to be said for that fundamental tenet of our legal system that says one is innocent until proven guilty. However, that very thing means victims - often vulnerable, and often children - are automatically disbelieved.