I didn't compare ff to smoking.
Infant feeding is a public health issue for both mothers and babies as well as a being a lifestyle choice for parents.
I just object to the insistence that it is nothing BUT a lifestyle choice and the dogged determination to ignore the evidence on the known risks and drawbacks of ff to the health of babies and women.
We would never apply the reasoning that 'if you can't see it it's not there' to any other health issue, so why do we do it with infant feeding?
I think people want posters like me to be unsympathetic and fascistic about breastfeeding - want us to insist against all the evidence that all women can and should breastfeed. But I don't believe that and I'm not saying it. Sorry to throw a spanner in the works of your argument.
I'm saying that as a society something very major and unprecedented has happened to the way we feed babies, that it's happen very very fast (in terms of human history), with no planning, precious little consistent, large scale, good quality research to support its long term safety, it's been driven by commercial interests and by the lifestyle choices of adults and it hasn't had promoting the well-being of babies as its primary focus.
I'm saddened by how complacent adult women are about this issue, how quick to rubbish the evidence or overlook the research by scientists and organisations who have no vested financial interest in increasing rates of breastfeeding, and how eager to swallow whole assurances from formula manufacturers whose claims for the efficacy and safety of their products rest on far less and far shoddier evidence than that of the medical establishment promoting breastfeeding.