Here is the OP:
'I'm a lurker. Can't help it, I find AIBU gets me through many a night feed. I'm always totally shocked at how blasé some posters can be when giving advice "she sounds unbearable to me, I'd go NC" and similar phrases.
Really? Just like that you'd advise someone you don't know to break all ties with a relative over a situation you've only heard one side of, creating a family situation that can become unbearable for husbands / wives / siblings who are very literally stuck in the middle?
I know there are some situations when decisions are taken not to see family anymore for various good reasons but I'd seriously hope these were carefully considered and thought through in time given the wider impact it can have. NC just seems so normal to so many. Is it just me that thinks (safety of children etc aside) most problems are at least worth working on?'
These are the OP's words.
Observe this key sentence:
Is it just me that thinks (safety of children etc aside) most problems are at least worth working on?
The entire thread has been relevant to the OP. All those people up there, talking about how their problems - which didn't always involve the safety of children - simply couldn't be worked out. About how they didn't find being NC 'normal'. They are all relevant. We are all responding to the OP.
The OP came back and said, if I remember correctly, that this thread had 'really opened her eyes'.
You are not leaving the thread because it's gone off topic - it's never been off-topic. You're leaving it because there's no proof, actually, that the casual exclusion of ILs etc is actually advocated on MN.
And also probably because you're bored. As am I.