I would certainly never smirk, and look through my fingers at my under age DD illegally having sex before she was 16...whilst congratulatring myself that I was down wid da kids, yeah, and what an open and equal relationship I had with my DD.
I'm her Mum. I'm not here to act like a trendy older sister, or a devoted best friend. I am here to always, always look after her best interests, and to protect her from herself, on occasion.
Um, sorry but when did that poster say she was "smirking" and congratulating herself on being"down wid da kids"? I've re-read her post and I can't find anywhere where such a claim was made.
Her DD came to her asking for the pill as she wanted to have sex. If teenagers are going to have sex, they will and no amount of "you're too young", "it's illegal" and "you should wait" is going to change that. Would you rather that poster stuck her head into the sand and ignored the situation until her daughter came home pregnant one day because she wasn't protected? Personally I'd much rather have a daughter on the pill than a baby in the dumpster.
That poster even said herself that she would rather her kids waited until they were 18 to have sex however she knew that wasn't going to happen and she would have sex with or without her approval. She was being responsible by helping her get the pill and making sure she was protected. How exactly is that behaving like a trendy older sister?
The thing is though, it's fine to say that you wouldn't want your children to have sex under 16. I understand that. But other than the fact it becomes legal when your 16 what else changes? Nobody waves a magic wand the minute you turn 16 and you're suddenly ready for sex. Lots of people won't be. My best friend didn't have sex until she was 19 and then told me afterwards that she regretted it and wasn't really ready. Even now she regrets it. Yet I had sex at 14 and I was ready and have no regrets about it (see previous post). 16 is just a guide line, some people will be ready sooner, others won't be until much later.