The actual murderer was found convicted on overwhelming evidence and sentenced years ago. There's not a shred of evidence to link her.
Guerdy(?sp) was convicted but there is no doubt he did not act alone. Meredith had bruising consistent with someone holding her down while someone else stabbed her.
Apart from her knowing how Meredith died when she supposedly hadn't seen the body.
Apart from two knives being used, one was never found, another was a match for the knife found at Solecito's, where Meredith had never been, but had her DNA on it.
Her DNA mixed in with Meredith's DNA.
She has been found guilty. She has not been found guilty, innocent, guilty. In Italian law there are 2 automatic appeals, one for the defendant, one for the prosecution. Finally the verdict goes to an Italian version of the high court, that last stage has not happened.
The most recent case was the prosecution appeal. The basis was that the defence won their appeal because they considered every piece of evidence separately, this appeal has criticised that and said things should be taken together.
Yes a lot of the evidence is circumstantial
The phones being switched off, neither usually did this but on that night they did.
Solecito phoning his sister and not the police.
The staged break in.
Knowing Meredith would be alone.
The flatmates being so suspicious that after giving Knox a lift to the police station they searched their car in case something had been hidden.
The fact they both smoked pot and the other accused may have supplied them but they claimed not to know him.
Yes lots of circumstantial, but put it together with the DNA, the false accusation, the other evidence.