that when a thread like this comes along, I would have thought it would be the perfect time for someone to come along from MNHQ, and rather than simply say, 'we don't stand for any disabilist posts' to cite the campaign and put forward a stance - ie yes it is hard for parents with small children on public transport - BUT the wheelchair space on buses is for wheelchairs ( or sn buggies) and therefore if anyone has to fold, then it has to be the buggy, and that is that
Yes. That would be brilliant. I really don't see the point of TIMC if MNHQ isn't willing to make such a statement.
Thinking about it, these are just the sort of things that MN TIMC campaign could get behind - there are so many threads about buggies on buses, parent parking spaces, children making noise in public spaces, children in trollies in supermarket etc - all of them often descending into a discussion where people bring up their children's disabilities, and other posters throw their hands up in the air and it descends into anger and hurt
Campaigns about sn trollies in supermarkets, why buggies should fold on buses, etc with rl examples would be positive practical things that the campaign could get behind
Backing the points in the TIMC campaign is really the very least MNHQ could do on these kinds of threads.
If they won't, then what has really changed?