Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if a school turning its canteen halal of kosher is them imposing a faith on people

439 replies

Souredstones · 17/09/2013 18:27

I don't know how I feel about this but a Facebook post has really made me think if a school canteen is halal or kosher then isn't it imposing a faith on its pupils? Or is it? I don't know so I defer to the wise ladies of Mumsnet for a decision

OP posts:
BigW · 18/09/2013 10:35

I wasn't going to comment on here and normally avoid these threads like the plague but I just wanted to point out/ repeat a couple of points.

First of all there is no non Jewish school in the land serving kosher food. It is expensive and there are far too many rules regarding its preparation for anyone to think it's a good idea outside of a Jewish setting.

Secondly, there are only a few hundred thousand Jews in this country. Most people don't realise that and assume that the population is much bigger.

Third and final point. To those of you who object to eating halal meat - sorry to say that you've probably eaten it hundreds of times already. Could you tell the difference? No.

I always find threads like this upsetting because there are genuine threats to the continuation of kosher/halal slaughter in the UK. What would that mean to people like me? Should I leave the UK in search of a country that allows me the freedom to practice my religion? I thought we were a tolerant society.

LessMissAbs · 18/09/2013 10:44

In answer to your third point bigw, personally I couldn't participate in something that caused greater animal suffering when there is a more humane method out there. Its relatively easy to stop eating meat, which is what your religion is gradually pushing me towards. Id honestly be hard pushed to say when I last ate meat, probably about six weeks ago, and that was a fillet steak from a farm shop.

Beastofburden · 18/09/2013 10:46

BigW

This is difficult. I am sure you and I would agree on some traditional practices linked to religious practices which are not suited to the UK, such as FGM. Nobody here is defending FGM, or saying that ritual slaughter is as bad as that. But we do have a limit to what we agree to tolerate in the UK in order to promote religious freedom.

So does ritual slaughter cross that line? From the evidence on animal suffering that I have seen in the past, I am concerned that it might do, but I don't know how good that evidence is, so I am not sure.

If the evidence were to be good, then I would say that this is one faith practice we can't support, so you would have to eat imported meat or go veggie. But if there were no good evidence on aminal suffering, then I think it would be reasonable to carry on with it.

Schools are however a special place and I think should be religiously neutral. So if diet is becoming a big issue, I would say state schools ought to ge vegetarian.

MaidOfStars · 18/09/2013 10:57

BigW YOUR right to practise YOUR religion starts and ends with you. I would be unwilling to accept any extension of this right, where such extension allows/causes undue harm to other animals, human or non-human, especially in those who are unable to consent to such harm.

Beastofburden · 18/09/2013 10:58

Btw BigW it sounds as if you would be able to live off New Zealand Lamb as this is halal never buying it again

AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 11:02

MaidofStars - I agree with this.

littleducks · 18/09/2013 11:10

BW

I have already posted this but there are schools serving kosher for their Jewish pupils, special schools in both Brent and Barnet do. They are prepared off site and reheated (seperately ) then served with separate cutlery.

crescentmoon · 18/09/2013 11:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 11:34

I just believe that if people are going to kill animals, they should do it in the way that causes least suffering.

ifyourehoppyandyouknowit · 18/09/2013 11:37

It would seem odd to to try to ban Halal slaughter on the grounds of protecting animals, without taking a long look at all the other practices involved in the mass production of meat for consumption.

TheSporkforeatingkyriarchy · 18/09/2013 11:37

AdventureTed - if you would like research, I recommend the writings by Temple Gradin (her main issue is the habit across all slaughter methods of hanging animals to drain the blood). She has a website and several books on the topic.

Also, while phobia originates in ancient Greek, the origin of using it to mean hate begins with the LGBT* movement when homosexuality was considered by the system to be a mental disorder, people who fought used the same language from the system to treat the hate and oppression of others as a mental illness as well. Trying to use ancient greek origins to negate the struggle ignores that the history of the struggle is important and that language has evolved.

AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 11:51

Spork - George Weinberg coined the term to mean an irrational fear of gay people.

crescentmoon · 18/09/2013 11:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 11:57

Crescentmoon - the animal should suffer as little distress and pain as possible.

EldritchCleavage · 18/09/2013 11:58

we can eat the meat of christians

At the risk of lowering the tone, crescentmoon this had me imagining you chowing down on a bit of Plymouth Brethren or munching some Methodist!

AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 11:59

Spork - Weinberg stated this on his Huffpost Blog.

Souredstones · 18/09/2013 12:10

So why, if you are a follower of a faith or an atheist are you not allowed to object to prayers of another religion being spoken over your meat?

I know it seems a small thing to some, mainly atheists, but if its such a big issue for Muslims to have the prayer said over the meat and acknowledged as such then the contrary position can also be said to be true?

Or am I being too simplistic?

I'm genuinely confused over this whole issue!

OP posts:
AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 12:14

Souredstones - that's what I thought.

IceBeing · 18/09/2013 12:24

hmm or how can the objection to words not being said while killing be more or less valid than an objection to words being said while killing....

I sometimes think the atheists get a raw deal because we are somehow expected to be more grown up about the whole thing.

Like:

Muslim: I won't eat it if X hasn't been said.
Jew: I won't eat it if Y hasn't been said.
Atheist: I won't eat it if X or Y has been said.
Everyone: Oh don't be ridiculous Atheists...why should you care....

Surely insisting that magic words be said is no more or less ridiculous than insisting they aren't?

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 18/09/2013 12:27

such tolerance on this thread (and I am an atheist)

Souredstones · 18/09/2013 12:28

Eh fanjo? Sorry if I've offended anyone!

OP posts:
IceBeing · 18/09/2013 12:28

ha...well yes I suppose as with many areas of life it is a matter of being tolerant right up until it actually inconveniences you personally.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 18/09/2013 12:31

It doesn't inconvienience me to respect someone's religion and their wish to have prayers said over meat, no, if it means a lot to them.

LapsedPacifist · 18/09/2013 12:32

If you are happy for your kids to eat meat, halal or therwise, regardless of its' provenance, ie if you aren't bothered whether the animals were free-range or treated and slaughtered in a humane fashion then YABVVU and a hypocrite.

AdventureTed · 18/09/2013 12:35

IceBeing - true.