Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To think it is ridiculous that a woman with 11 kids is getting a £400,000 house for nowt

999 replies

angelos02 · 19/02/2013 09:59

Especially when most working people couldn't never afford to live somewhere costing that much?
Link: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2280385/Home-fit-dole-queen-Mother-11-gets-BRAND-NEW-400-000-house-built-council-shes-struggling-current-homes.html

OP posts:
seeker · 19/02/2013 19:41

How many of them were ramped at 13?

gordyslovesheep · 19/02/2013 19:41

I also work with 'people like her' and their families - oh and I grew up with them - I am from a working class single parent household you see - despite being left wing

seeker · 19/02/2013 19:41

Raped

LtEveDallas · 19/02/2013 19:42

Local news landof, which is far more balanced than the Daily Hate.

Rhiannon86 · 19/02/2013 19:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

gordyslovesheep · 19/02/2013 19:42

I don't know - I don't know him - I am guessing he gets CTC and housing benefit to support his (taxed) wage if he works - like most low waged workers

Ashoething · 19/02/2013 19:42

Why dont I care about the wealthy avoiding tax?-if its wealth that they have worked bloody hard to earn then sorry but I would be hotfooting it to monaco too rather than pay for feckless morons.

Ashoething · 19/02/2013 19:44

So he cant actually afford 11 kids then and they have to be subsidised? Well we better all start breeding quickly then if this is all hunky dory.

HappyMummyOfOne · 19/02/2013 19:44

We definitely send the wrong signal out to people, the message seems to be have lots of children and dont work and we'll hand you life on a plate but work and you'll be less well off as you need to pay taxes to allow others the choice. No wonder we have such a high teen pregnancy rate.

If a parent point blank refuses to take responsibility and provide for a child then SS should step in rather than simply hand more out in benefits.

Given their are granchildren involved and no working adults in the house, the benefit cycle is already continuing. Handing her a nice new house wont encourage a work ethic in the children in any shape or form.

People are allowed to do it though as on here alone many believe its her choice, never mnd the amount of money the state is paying her a month could be spent on schools or hospitals. It doesnt matter if she gets the rent to pay over or it goes direct to the LL, its still cash she claims. Earners dont deduct their rent when stating their income, its a bill like any other. The benefits cap obviously cant come soon enough.

gordyslovesheep · 19/02/2013 19:45

good for you Grin I always believed I had a moral responsibility to ALL of society including those less well off and with complex needs

landofsoapandglory · 19/02/2013 19:46

The story broke last night in the Gloucestershire Citizen LtEve, not the Daily Mail, then all the nationals picked up on it.

gordyslovesheep · 19/02/2013 19:46

Ashoe I get CTC and CB as well Grin as a single parent - isn't that awful Grin

It pays for pony club Grin

Ashoething · 19/02/2013 19:46

Does complex needs=being a selfish idiot?

LtEveDallas · 19/02/2013 19:46

If a parent point blank refuses to take responsibility and provide for a child then SS should step in rather than simply hand more out in benefits

Looked After children cost more actually.

AKissIsNotAContract · 19/02/2013 19:47

What about inherited wealth then? Still ok for people to pay no tax on that?

MrsDeVere · 19/02/2013 19:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

CecilyP · 19/02/2013 19:48

It doesn't anywhere say she was raped. There was no mention of 12/13. It says she first became pregnant at 14, so possibly had her first daughter at 15 which tallies with the ages (both 36 and 37) given in the article.

MrsDeVere · 19/02/2013 19:48

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LtEveDallas · 19/02/2013 19:48

Actually it was the Echo, then the Citizen Landof. Makes a change from their usual 'lost cat' stories - even my elderly parents have given up on it.

Angelfootprints · 19/02/2013 19:49

Moral responsibility includes teaching people how to build their own life and contribute back into society. Not simply take, take, take.

In fact by handing her a life on a plate and condoning it you are doing her the Absolute opposite of moral responsibility.

Ashoething · 19/02/2013 19:49

No gordy- My own mum was a single parent-she has always had 2 jobs and apart from cb has never claimed benefits. She would have been ashamed to kive a life on benefits.

Did your finger slip with all thoseGrin or are you merely trying to be goady?

seeker · 19/02/2013 19:49

Ashoething- you haven't yet explained how a 13 year old having sex with a 22 year old can be anything but rape.

usualsuspect · 19/02/2013 19:50

So the SS should step in, put them in care and then it will cost you more in tax.

Great idea.

LtEveDallas · 19/02/2013 19:51

Given their are granchildren involved and no working adults in the house, the benefit cycle is already continuing

There are 3 working adults in the house.

gordyslovesheep · 19/02/2013 19:51

well CTC didn't exist then did it - or I am sure your mum would have got what she was entitled to

I am not ashamed - I work - without CTC I wouldn't be able to - so I'd rather work

No shame at all here ... nope none at all