Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To feel phsyically sick at this suggestive toddler t-shirt, and the even more inappropriate write up...

176 replies

SaffronCake · 23/09/2012 14:13

Perhaps Your 2 year old is just a cupcake looking for her stud muffin (so she can kick her legs about all night- WTF)?

Mine sure as hell isn't.

t-shirt at Zulily

Just kill me now. Even running the risk of an AIBU flaming isn't as bad as this fucking abomination.

OP posts:
Mia4 · 23/09/2012 19:23

Last one i saw was for infants and was 'porn star in training' so i'd say that n was tame in comparison tbh.

Mia4 · 23/09/2012 19:25

Not meaning i think i's right, it's not but there's a trend f them getting worse >

BoffinMum · 23/09/2012 19:32

That is pretty bad. I am glad people have made a fuss.

TheBigJessie · 23/09/2012 19:48

mia What the actual French Connection UK? Oh... My... God...

If you could hear me, I would sound just like Chandler Bing's ex in Friends.

Who buys that?

FamiliesShareGerms · 23/09/2012 19:57

Well, I had been thinking about registering with Zulily, as some of the girls stuff in the adverts looks cute, but that t-shirt is beyond inappropriate and is so vile I shan't bother.

Mia4 · 23/09/2012 20:31

TheBigJessie, yes the toddler was wearing it, mum thought it was funny. I was pretty much just thinking 'please, no, leave, that's awful' Poor child.

Wigeon · 23/09/2012 20:36

Yes, I'd noticed the ads and thought that the girls' skirts looked sweet and thankfully non-pink / cutesy, but now have a completely different view of the company!

TheBigJessie - yes, thank you, I see what you mean. Something similar about saying "a Muslim / Christian etc child" - I'm with Richard Dawkins in thinking that a small child can't have a religion in any meaningful sense (even if their parents take them to mosque / church and they receive Eid / Christmas presents).

Pornstar in training Shock Shock!

TheBigJessie · 23/09/2012 21:15

Yep. Have whatever views you want (because I can't stop you [cross face]), but don't use your child as a billboard to publically outline your expectations of them.

This is Jessie's Don't Be A Prat check-list, section C, subsection 3t.

QuintessentialShadows · 23/09/2012 21:22

I wont be registering with this site, that is for sure.

bumperella · 23/09/2012 21:24

I'm amazed that some people don't see this as grotesque. A baby/toddler vest refering to her wanting a hunky man...(which is what I'd think "stud muffin" meant)? Really,suggesting a 2 year old "on the prowl" and able to appreciate a bloke as being sexually attractive....that's OK?

I saw a top in Zara with the slogan "working girl" on it. To me, working girl means hooker. I thought that was pretty grim for a 3-year-old, even if it was a translation-issue, and wrote a complaint letter.

TheBigJessie · 23/09/2012 21:47

bumperella but how can it be grotesque? It mentions cupcakes! Is that not the definition of cute?

Extrospektiv · 23/09/2012 23:59

No, it's not grotesque for a 2 year old. It's funny, some people need to take a joke. Not everything is OH MY FUCKING PAEDOMAGEDDON and there are other things to worry about that actually matter.

LineRunner · 24/09/2012 00:27

There are always other things to worry about.

But it doesn't mean you have to turn a blind a blind eye to fucking shite.

MrDobalina · 24/09/2012 00:35

i dont think its funny
i think grotesque just about sums it up

Angry

really suprised at how many people think its ok

FizzyLaces · 24/09/2012 00:39

Horrible and not at all funny. Why do people think this is funny?

Thumbwitch · 24/09/2012 00:49

Nothing funny about sexualising a toddler IMO Hmm

MmeLindor · 24/09/2012 00:51

I am a bit surprised at how many find this not worthy of complaint.

Of course there are worse things in the world, but MN have been very vocal with their Let Girls Be Girls campaign, against sexualisation of children, and so it is to be expected that a few of us would be appalled by this.

Stud muffin - to me that means a sexually promiscuous young man, and there is absolutely no reason why that should be on a toddler's tshirt.

MrDobalina · 24/09/2012 00:58

stud muffin

muffin

TroublesomeEx · 24/09/2012 06:33

OP, I agree it's in very bad taste, but just at it like I do.

It's the little things like that which let me know who to avoid when out in the real world. Wink

TroublesomeEx · 24/09/2012 06:34

just look at it like I do.

nameuschangeus · 24/09/2012 06:36

It's horrible. Who would put a child in that?

TheDoctrineOfSnatch · 24/09/2012 07:03

But Folk the very fact it's available makes some people think it's acceptable. After all it must have gone through several product or purchasing committees at Zulily - and they aren't all carrying a handy identifying badge.

LapsusLinguae · 24/09/2012 07:07

Mme thank goodness - I couldn't believe that no one had mentioned the Let Girls Be Girls campaign!

Q for MNHQ - do you forward info on that campaign to your newer advertising customers? Has this company signed up?!

TheDoctrineOfSnatch · 24/09/2012 07:09

Also things like this involving products for sale are among the simplest to protest and change, as it's down to one or two individuals at a company usually. several such campaigns started or participated in by MNers have resulted in eg T shirts trivialising sexual abuse being removed from sale in certain outlets, or in the major supermarkets dropping "men's interest" and "women's interest" sections to "sport" "cookery" "business" etc.

MN is slap bang in Zulilly's target market which is why they advertise here. I hope they will listen to their customers.

spottyock · 24/09/2012 07:42

I'm more offended by the connotation that all that girl will ever want in life is a 'partner'.

Swipe left for the next trending thread