I don't know why I am now bothering to reply but here goes:
'AIBU to think this is over-sexualisation of a 7-year old?' was not finished with 'by the man' and my only actual 'questions' (you know, the ones with a question mark at the end?) were in relation to society and to whether or not the father's response was 'far-fetched' - ie unusual. A few years ago there were thongs available for this age group - it was described as over-sexualisation, but I didn't get the impression that the accusation was actually that anyone who bought them was abusing their child, more that it was mis-placed or inappropriate.
No I am not the mother.....or the father.
I would be very worried if a 7-year old did not have an awareness of sex - not to have told a child the basics by this age would in my opinion be a dereliction of parental duty and even if a child has not been told the basics by that age most of them are aware that there is something 'special' about the relationship between adult men and women - I don't mean a full-blown awareness of all aspects of sex but children from birth are learning about all things all the time and by 7 will know 'something' about the relationship between adults - even if they don't know anything about penises and vaginas etc. But a child with no awareness - I'm sorry that would REALLY worry me with regards to the parent's attitudes towards sex.
as said before, 'already' was in the context of two sets of parents talking about how quickly children (and this child in particular as the eldest of the group) grow up. The 'trying it on' is an unfortunate response to the fact that he (and his wife? I don't know) has decided that he will not lip-kiss his daughter and that she is now trying to. One assumes that they (through their own issues with sex) have decided to avoid lip-kisses for sexual reasons and that therefore his first response when faced with her trying to lip-kiss is to associate it with his (their?) reasons, not to see it from the little girls eyes.
Please, please read my actual words - did I ever say anything about having any concern about the father - NO! I was asking about society's impact on how this father was thinking and behaving and wondering if it was me that was out of synch with everyone else or him.
I am relieved to find that it is him - which leads me to my concerns about the attitudes towards sex that they are passing on to their children.
As said a few posts back (and in this epic one), the purpose was to establish if lip-kissing children was no longer the 'done thing' in a society that continually perplexes me with fathers worrying about bathing their daughters, adults reluctant to offer help to children in distress less they be accused of acting inappropriately, teenage girls accusing parents/step-parents for 'a joke'. My attitudes tend to be out-dated so wanted to get a feel. I've got that feel so mission accomplished but I am very saddened at the way that things have been viewed. Maybe I didn't phrase my original post as well as I should, but if you read the words without trying to put your own twist on it I think it stands and that I have not back-tracked at all.
I had no desire to provoke a reaction that was man-hating, however it does seem that people are quick to label a throw-away comment that prompted my question as 'not normal' and as an indication that something is wrong - 'can you in all honesty say your response would be the same if it were a woman' ....now the number of times I have read that on here....do you wonder why I have the impression that I have?
And of course I have read things that I didn't feel uncomfortable with - I didn't expect this thread to take the course it did. I expected - 'odd thing to say, we kiss our DC on the lips all the time - never occurred to me that people would choose not to but each to their own - some fathers do choose to avoid certain activities with their daughters' or 'we try to avoid lip-kissing, society has sexualised children so much that we see it as best avoided', not 'Totally wrong, he's abusing her, report to social services immediately'.
I am not ignoring the posts that talk suggesting the risk of abuse, just trying to point out that that concern was not in my head when I originally posted and that whilst I will endeavour to keep an eye I believe it to be highly unlikely.