Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I do not understand why people have kids when they can not afford them.

727 replies

sea74 · 07/08/2012 10:15

I know this topic will create lots of critics but i want to share my thoughts and see if anyone agrees or i am the odd one out.
I come from a european country where the fertility rate is 1.4 that is each woman/family has 1.4 child. Grandparents very often are the to help, but women (and men) are responsible enough not to have children if they can not afford them or look after them.
I grew up thinking that i want children not because i want them for me but because i have to donate life and their life must be a good life. Children are not mine but they are individuals.

Having said that, when i moved to the UK, i realised how things are different.
I feel that many people think children will not change their lives, they get pregnant easily, they do not really worry too much (and take contraception) in order to avoid pregnancies.
Then, when they have the child, you see that often these children live in broken families, or the single mothers do not have 50 pounds to buy them a decent meal, or they are left in front of the tv all summer because they had not planned childcare is expensive and grandparents live far.

Children should be planned carefully, i think and it is very selfish to have them without thinking of (and being ready for) the consequences.

OP posts:
Scrounginscum · 07/08/2012 23:26

Nobody has answered my questions.

Moominsarescary · 07/08/2012 23:27

I can't believe it changed nurses to murderers Confused

MaryHansack · 07/08/2012 23:28

'xenophobia' carer obviously!!

Moominsarescary · 07/08/2012 23:29

Sorry scrounger can't answer your questions as I have no idea why people think that way

Scrounginscum · 07/08/2012 23:30

Because cater when you run out of replies resort to accusing your opponent of something heinous. First rule of debating, just listen to the MPs.

NovackNGood · 07/08/2012 23:31

Ah ghosthip your usual retort when you lost the debate about the OP's point that people should take personal responsibility for paying for their own children and think of their family planning rather than expecting the rest of us to bail them out all the time.

carernotasaint · 07/08/2012 23:31

If Novack is so sure of her facts then why doesnt she talk to the police about us "anti immigrant xenophobes"

Moominsarescary · 07/08/2012 23:31

Bloody phone scroungin sorry, could take a guess but it would probably be deleted

LadyBeagleEyes · 07/08/2012 23:33

Ignore scrounging.
And can I suggest you change your nn.
I'm so not comfortable addressing you with that name, as someone back on benefits I know how hard it is, please don't let the bastards get you down.

GhostShip · 07/08/2012 23:33

Is Novack drunk? You're not making sense. My 'usual retort'. I don't have a book of retorts for each debate I get into, and since I've never been in this one before I doubt it's my 'usual'. You're confusing me more and more.

When one has lost an argument one tends to call the other side a racist or criticise their spelling.

NovackNGood · 07/08/2012 23:34

carer yes that's just what I pay the police to do is to go chasing after any fool on the internet. Hmm

AbsolutelyNotHoneyDragon · 07/08/2012 23:34

We are going to need considerably larger bingo cards Sad

GhostShip · 07/08/2012 23:34

What you pay? Oh you mean we.

carernotasaint · 07/08/2012 23:35

Yep Resorting to name calling has the added effect of making you look childish as well!

Moominsarescary · 07/08/2012 23:36

Oh you personally pay all police wages do you?

LadyBeagleEyes · 07/08/2012 23:36

Grin honey.
This is a horrible thread, isn't it?

usualsuspect · 07/08/2012 23:36

Has Norvack lost the plot Grin

carernotasaint · 07/08/2012 23:37

Because you know that your allegations have no basis in fact. And you know damn well that the police DO go after people WHEN it does happen as has been so well demonstrated by cases involving Twitter in recent months.

NovackNGood · 07/08/2012 23:38

Well ghostship since you have no facts to back up anything you say and are now starting with the personal insults time to block you and leave you.

Moominsarescary · 07/08/2012 23:39

Is calling those on low wages or benefits immigrant bashers a new one for the bingo cards?

usualsuspect · 07/08/2012 23:40

If only you could block on MN

GhostShip · 07/08/2012 23:41
  1. Back what up? What would you like me to back up?
  2. Pretty sure you got personal first.
  3. Do we have a block function?
Moominsarescary · 07/08/2012 23:44

Maybe novack has blocked the thread, shame I was wondering what random madness would be spouted next

Scrounginscum · 07/08/2012 23:51

Ok have I got this now?

If you are unemployed you are lazy scum because you won't get off your arse (sic) to take just any job, BUT if you take just any job to avoid unemployment you are still lazy scum if that job is low paid. Because people in low paid jobs are lazy and not worth even NMW. If I do get a higher paid job one day I am still scum because I had a period of needing financial help.

So whatever I do or whatever happens now I'll always be scum. That's a great incentive.

What's it like to be so perfect?

AbsolutelyNotHoneyDragon · 07/08/2012 23:56

Scrounge please don't forget that if you make something for yourself, work hard and one day are in the position to pay someone else you are then exploitative scum.

Swipe left for the next trending thread