Whatmeworry - I don't understand what you mean by "unwanted militancy" in relation to this thread. Can you give examples?
This thread has been about women having the right to do whatever they feel necessary or desirable when feeding their babies. No-one has been told that they must get their breasts out in public, or that topless breastfeeding is the only proper way to do things. People have been saying that IF a woman wants/needs to feed in a way that some people would consider indiscrete, then she should be able to do so, supported to do so and free to do so without comment or censure.
Equally IF someone wishes, for any reason whatsoever, to remain as covered-up as possible, they should be free to do so. No-one has told them they are doing it wrong - people have pointed out that it is a shame that many people are MADE to feel like they have to go to elaborate lengths to remain covered at all times, but no-one is saying that modesty in itself is wrong.
I have seen threads where some people have used BFing to bash others about the head or make them feel inferior. There have been threads where people have shared their stories about "failing" at BFing and been told they didn't try hard enough. There have been threads where people have been disbelieved when sharing a reason they could not breastfeed, or told they could have done so in some pretty extreme circumstances. There have been threads where people have gone on and on and on about the "breast is best" message, with no attempt to soften their approach when it has been quite clear that another poster is getting distressed. I hate those threads. I firmly believe that there are ways of getting information across without trampling other peoples' feelings underfoot.
But this isn't one of those threads. Simply being about an aspect of BFing doesn't make it one of those threads. The problem with the whole militant/gestapo/mafiatype accusation is that( even if you consider these to be acceptable terms) it is spectacularly over-used. It is trotted out on pretty much every thread where someone pro-breastfeeding makes any sort of comment. It has become the standard response to pro-breastfeeding comments and it makes any sort of reasoned discussion very difficult. Putting across a different point of view, even putting across a different point of view repeatedly, does not make someone a militant - it makes them someone who does not agree with you and is continuing not to agree with you, and is not being persuaded by your opposing views.
Sometimes I do wonder what people want of posters who are peer supporters/breastfeeding counsellors/midwives etc. For them simply not to post any sort of opinion or information abotu this topic? For them to immediately roll over and agree with any opposing view? To give information/advice that goes against anything they believe to be true?
It is a divisive topic unfortunately, but it can still lead to perfectly reasonable discussions, but only if some people recognise that not everyone will agree with them and that people have an absolute right to defend their own opinions and beliefs as long as they do so in accordance with the talk guidelines and, ideally, in a compassionate way.