For the record, I am both Christian and, personally, pro life, (though am pro choice for everyone else).
I, and the many women I have met through support networks who have also suffered a loss in the same circumstances as my family, had NO choice in the loss of our child, only a choice as to how we would get through our nightmare. What options would these people offer to us? They would add to our grief with their assumption, (the assumption that we were undergoing the procedure when there were other alternatives to our situation). Or are you suggesting that all women attending these clinics should explain their reasons for being there? Maybe women like me would then get a 'free pass', (though I believe the gentleman in the BBC interview said they opposed abortion in all situations, so maybe not)?
LtEve is correct; the women visiting these clinics are there because they have made a choice, be it a choice to receive counselling, or a choice to undergo an abortion. If they want counselling or advice on the alternatives, they are free to seek this out also. What is not right is to thrust this advice on them at an emotional fraught and traumatic time, no matter how 'composed and compassionate' these advisors feel they are being.
All people have a right to their own, considered choice but no person has the right to deliberately target those in oppostion when they have no choice to remove themselves from the situation. You don't like my point of view on this, you switch of your computer. A vulnerable woman does not like the 'composed' point of view being offered to her outside a medical clinic, what should she do? Walk away from the help she needs?
On a final note, please do not brow beat others for vitriol and bigotry when you trot out the 'tearing a baby limb from limb', line out. Composed and compassionate? I think not.